Subscribe to ForumIAS

[Results] Prelims 2020 Over - Gearing for 2021

Because of the corona virus issue? If it does not happen then worst affected will be people whose interview is stuck, around 600-700 such people I think are yet to appear for their interview.


@neyawn sir and others, what is your take?

This is the official Thread for discussion of Prelims Postponement, Please do not create new threads for the same.

jack_Sparrow,curious_kidand137 otherslike this
6.9m views

13.7k comments

Its better not to get into discussions of pre now and get into the mode of mains preparation. There are lot of debatable questions(atleast 6-10)whose discussions never end. Jo hona tha ho gaya, ab sidha UPSC vedict dega. 
mightyraju,Badluramand3 otherslike this
7.1k views
@amansingh_parihar581 this article shows that MRP of non urea chemical fertilisers is market driven and companies even after taking subsidies may not translate it into lower MRP.


6.7k views

2 reason for that......

1.read its hindi translation

2.willfully implied that someone phsically harm it.....else the cyber attack wont need to insert the wilful nature.....the statement clearly said it so if damage by accident not cover only by wilful....so obviously that some1 broken it or punch it

Wilfully doesn't mean physically, it means deliberately.

Yup I have read Hindi translation as well. Both means same

Then does cyber attack could be possible without the wilful nature as well......

Cyber attack/ cyber related security incident may be accidental or delibrate..

Do u think other as spoon feeder......attack always deliberate and wilful......else it mark with word "incidental" not wilful

6.7k views

2 reason for that......

1.read its hindi translation

2.willfully implied that someone phsically harm it.....else the cyber attack wont need to insert the wilful nature.....the statement clearly said it so if damage by accident not cover only by wilful....so obviously that some1 broken it or punch it

Wilfully doesn't mean physically, it means deliberately.

Yup I have read Hindi translation as well. Both means same

Then does cyber attack could be possible without the wilful nature as well......

Cyber attack/ cyber related security incident may be accidental or delibrate..

Do u think other as spoon feeder......attack always deliberate and wilful......else it mark with word "incidental" not wilful

I didnt mean to offend anyone

What I meant to say is

1.) Accidental: someone (you or someone else) connected any other device without the knowledge of that being infected by malware

2.) Delibrate: someone knowingly infected the computer with malware/spyware etc.



The point I am raising is that in second statement, it is not clear whose computer, we are talking about.

No other interpolation/extrapolation/interpretation.

Therefore I was looking for advice to whether make a representation on this ambiguity or not??

5.9k views

2 reason for that......

1.read its hindi translation

2.willfully implied that someone phsically harm it.....else the cyber attack wont need to insert the wilful nature.....the statement clearly said it so if damage by accident not cover only by wilful....so obviously that some1 broken it or punch it

Wilfully doesn't mean physically, it means deliberately.

Yup I have read Hindi translation as well. Both means same

Then does cyber attack could be possible without the wilful nature as well......

Cyber attack/ cyber related security incident may be accidental or delibrate..

Do u think other as spoon feeder......attack always deliberate and wilful......else it mark with word "incidental" not wilful

I didnt mean to offend anyone

What I meant to say is

1.) Accidental: someone (you or someone else) connected any other device without the knowledge of that being infected by malware

2.) Delibrate: someone knowingly infected the computer with malware/spyware etc.



The point I am raising is that in second statement, it is not clear whose computer, we are talking about.

No other interpolation/extrapolation/interpretation.

Therefore I was looking for advice to whether make a representation on this ambiguity or not??

Bro i was also in that position when read it out but for that reason sometimes i also read hindi so that narrative came out......when i read hindi i was sure that its talking abt physical harm....rest atb

Just request you to read hindi for once

6.2k views

2 reason for that......

1.read its hindi translation

2.willfully implied that someone phsically harm it.....else the cyber attack wont need to insert the wilful nature.....the statement clearly said it so if damage by accident not cover only by wilful....so obviously that some1 broken it or punch it

Wilfully doesn't mean physically, it means deliberately.

Yup I have read Hindi translation as well. Both means same

Then does cyber attack could be possible without the wilful nature as well......

Cyber attack/ cyber related security incident may be accidental or delibrate..

Do u think other as spoon feeder......attack always deliberate and wilful......else it mark with word "incidental" not wilful

I didnt mean to offend anyone

What I meant to say is

1.) Accidental: someone (you or someone else) connected any other device without the knowledge of that being infected by malware

2.) Delibrate: someone knowingly infected the computer with malware/spyware etc.



The point I am raising is that in second statement, it is not clear whose computer, we are talking about.

No other interpolation/extrapolation/interpretation.

Therefore I was looking for advice to whether make a representation on this ambiguity or not??

Bro i was also in that position when read it out but for that reason sometimes i also read hindi so that narrative came out......when i read hindi i was sure that its talking abt physical harm....rest atb

Just request you to read hindi for once

Bro I'm trying to understand your point of view.. please let me know what does prompt to interpret it about physical harm..

Which word in hindi???



5.6k views

2 reason for that......

1.read its hindi translation

2.willfully implied that someone phsically harm it.....else the cyber attack wont need to insert the wilful nature.....the statement clearly said it so if damage by accident not cover only by wilful....so obviously that some1 broken it or punch it

Wilfully doesn't mean physically, it means deliberately.

Yup I have read Hindi translation as well. Both means same

Then does cyber attack could be possible without the wilful nature as well......

Cyber attack/ cyber related security incident may be accidental or delibrate..

Do u think other as spoon feeder......attack always deliberate and wilful......else it mark with word "incidental" not wilful

I didnt mean to offend anyone

What I meant to say is

1.) Accidental: someone (you or someone else) connected any other device without the knowledge of that being infected by malware

2.) Delibrate: someone knowingly infected the computer with malware/spyware etc.



The point I am raising is that in second statement, it is not clear whose computer, we are talking about.

No other interpolation/extrapolation/interpretation.

Therefore I was looking for advice to whether make a representation on this ambiguity or not??

Bro i was also in that position when read it out but for that reason sometimes i also read hindi so that narrative came out......when i read hindi i was sure that its talking abt physical harm....rest atb

Just request you to read hindi for once

Bro I'm trying to understand your point of view.. please let me know what does prompt to interpret it about physical harm..

Which word in hindi???



Bhai apke liye abhi hindi padha......usme saaf saaf likha h "yadi jaan bhuj kar kisi dwara"......means agr in general hua h toh koun dega ins cover as log khud tod denge.....

And ab agr maan lo anjane me tumhare comp me cyber damage ho jayega toh kya ins valid nhi hoga....no chance bhai.....cyber ins full protection deta h for any cause related to all kind of stuff......

5.7k views
@amansingh_parihar581 mrunal has given some different logic to this question. 


amansingh_parihar581,
5.9k views
@Equalizer omss cant be considered govt trading....as govt sells it's excess stock to states or private players.... generally at a loss for it....which increases supply in the market and balances the market prices


5.6k views
@Sappling bro....just one question....damages here can mean anything..... through digital means also one can damage a computer.....is it not?? 


5.4k views
@Equalizer omss cant be considered govt trading....as govt sells it's excess stock to states or private players.... generally at a loss for it....which increases supply in the market and balances the market prices


Then what should be answer according to u?

8.1k views
I m in fertilizer trade and authorized stockist of few companies ,,, government controls fertilizer prices very strictly so strictly that any person who tries to make even a rupee less or more can go into jail ,,, moreover companies can not fix prices them selves it's the government which fixes price of urea and dap 
5.5k views
Government constantly sales the excess stocks which lies with the FCI and at the godowns of the rice mills as part of price stabilising mechanism ,,, it's not about loss or profit but it's a fact that government trades the rice stock so all options are correct
5.5k views
Shared are traded sometimes at loss no where in business it is written that trading can not be done in loss ,,, it's about the relevant need of time 
5.4k views

https://m.economictimes.com/industry/indl-goods/svs/chem-/-fertilisers/low-fertiliser-price-to-push-sales-in-the-ongoing-planting-season/articleshow/76423018.cms

amansingh_parihar581,
5.3k views
@Udit_pathak govt has made prices of fertilizers market driven except for urea. 


amansingh_parihar581,
5.3k views

I have doubt regard the Irwin Gandhi pact question (just to get clear idea and not trying to justify any option incorrect)

 1 . Prison include all kind of prisoners or it means be political prisoners

2. Any source which clearly mentions about ordinance that were to be withdrawn after pact 


4.9k views
@JamesMoriarty refer spectrum. It is clearly given.


5.3k views
@Equalizer bhai maine khud govt trading eliminate kiya tha....it did not make sense.... every coaching has given it as correct so I then started to research on how it is true.....omss although seems it does hv an impact on price and it is sort of selling of rice by govt but trading is a very larger term....it doesn't suit it....I thought you will be able to give me more clarity bas


6.6k views

I have doubt regard the Irwin Gandhi pact question (just to get clear idea and not trying to justify any option incorrect)

 1 . Prison include all kind of prisoners or it means be political prisoners

2. Any source which clearly mentions about ordinance that were to be withdrawn after pact 


Iske answr me koi confusion nahi hai. Don't discuss it, the question would be dropped anyway.

9.2k views
Write your comment…