[official][prelims 2023] How was prelims result? In or out?
Vote people, Vote!
And share!
Can the info be this accurate?
Maybe he means in the past. Unsure though
I’ve experienced it last year. Was getting 109 according to various keys(marking doubtful as wrong) , actual marks was 95. Year before, 92 something according to market, but was 84.xx Last two year significant divergence between institutes and official key
Mujhe lagraha ye insaan fek raha. Playing with sensitive emotions of students. 🥺
***
I’ve experienced it last year. Was getting 109 according to various keys(marking doubtful as wrong) , actual marks was 95. Year before, 92 something according to market, but was 84.xx Last two year significant divergence between institutes and official key
I think Science and tech questions play a major role in this. Marking all correct and getting it validated by coaching keys too inflate our score. Since 2020 not all statements are correct in Science and tech questions.
Because I have ended up with more marks in 2021 as compared to Forum key. Forum key - 100 , actual score - 116. And 3 questions were science and tech ones that went in my favor which were wrong according to coaching keys.
Mahi2306,
Maybe he means in the past. Unsure though
I’ve experienced it last year. Was getting 109 according to various keys(marking doubtful as wrong) , actual marks was 95. Year before, 92 something according to market, but was 84.xx Last two year significant divergence between institutes and official key
I think Science and tech questions play a major role in this. Marking all correct and getting it validated by coaching keys too inflate our score. Since 2020 not all statements are correct in Science and tech questions.
Even this year , science and tech questions were loaded IMO, green hydrogen directly used as fuel - do they mean without mixing , or without liquifying. Former is true , latter is false. Even the pulsar definition is way too vague
MoorkhDuryodhan,
This is the robotback guy 20 days before the exam. I have a feeling he might not be bluffing. 
plmokn25688524,
@Murali bhai itni tagdi prediction pe toh complain honi chahiye...Sala paper kaise pta lag rha hai logo ko upsc ka?
These are general predictions, Serious candidates knew it already.
Less likely to be predictions , someone talked. These are way too precise to be just general predictions
@Murali bhai itni tagdi prediction pe toh complain honi chahiye...Sala paper kaise pta lag rha hai logo ko upsc ka?
These are general predictions, Serious candidates knew it already.
Data sufficiency is too precise to be general.
Pam123,adi5manit330@Murali bhai itni tagdi prediction pe toh complain honi chahiye...Sala paper kaise pta lag rha hai logo ko upsc ka?
These are general predictions, Serious candidates knew it already.
Data sufficiency is too precise to be general.
And he is claiming that he knows the marks of people already. Like how is that happening
plmokn25688524,
plmokn25688524,ryzenauster
@DaemonT less likely to be a leak. Guess it’s internal chatter about the nature of paper. This person might have access to that.
***
Write your comment…
