Hello All,
The Group usage here is a little cumbersome, so I am creating this thread to make sure that all questions with doubts stay in one place. Can someone push all the doubts and queries here? I will make this an announcement?
-Faceless, Anonymous "root"
This is with respect to Q.15
'Planning' in India is associated with Union ministry of rural and union ministry of urban development.MoUD is involved in 'Smart City' project which involves City PlanningSimilar argument goes for MoRD it is also involved in Rural planning.Also, transportation planning, environmental planning, rural development etc are all in their mandate.Preparation of District Development Plan is executed by MoRD as well as MoHUA
Q15) UPSC previous year question and answer is as per the official answer key. The Planning Commission has an advisory power only and is not involved in the planning process. A simple elimination would give you the answer.
The appointment, posting and promotion of district judges in a state are made by the governor of the state in
consultation with the high court.
Who is responsible for the transfer of the district Judge ?
Since Constitution is silent on it it is undertaken by HC itself. The transfer orders are usually issued by the registrar of HC.
Q22) Statement 3 - Section 11A in The Representation of the People Act, 1951
Test 12, Q 49, statement two is also correct. "The state legislature may provide that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of the close of the financial year."
So correct option should be "c".
Pls clarify.
243ZN. Convening of general body meetings.—The Legislature of a Statemay, by law, make provisions that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of close of the financial year to transact the business as may be provided in such law.
SO it is not mandatory that meeting has to be there since state legislature may or may not provide for it.
http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/COI-updated-as-31072018.pdf Plz refer to this link for the said article.
Test 12, Q 49, statement two is also correct. "The state legislature may provide that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of the close of the financial year."
So correct option should be "c".
Pls clarify.
243ZN. Convening of general body meetings.—The Legislature of a Statemay, by law, make provisions that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of close of the financial year to transact the business as may be provided in such law.
SO it is not mandatory that meeting has to be there since state legislature may or may not provide for it.
http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/COI-updated-as-31072018.pdf Plz refer to this link for the said article.
Article 243ZM also says ".. state may by law,..." .
Same interpretation applies to both the provisions. Therefore, both options shall be incorrect by verbatim or both shall be correct by interpretation.
Q 34 TEST 12
NHRC caninquire suomotu.Its recommendatory body. point 3 in Q noted that POWER TO UNDERTAKE SUO MOTUACTIONS.IT SHOULD BE INQUIRE SUOMOTU OR SUO MOTU COGNIZANCE.
THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN CORRECTED IN STARTING OF EXAM OR QUE SHOULD BE DELETED. OR IF ANY ONE FIND EXACT WORDINGS FROM ANY AUTHENTIC SOURCE KINDLY SHARE IT.
THANK YOU.
Test 12, Q 49, statement two is also correct. "The state legislature may provide that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of the close of the financial year."
So correct option should be "c".
Pls clarify.
243ZN. Convening of general body meetings.—The Legislature of a Statemay, by law, make provisions that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of close of the financial year to transact the business as may be provided in such law.
SO it is not mandatory that meeting has to be there since state legislature may or may not provide for it.
http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/COI-updated-as-31072018.pdf Plz refer to this link for the said article.
Article 243ZM also says ".. state may by law,..." .
Same interpretation applies to both the provisions. Therefore, both options shall be incorrect by verbatim or both shall be correct by interpretation.
Please open the link file and search article 243ZM. The clause (1) and clause (2) of the article mention state legislature may provide. Clause (4) which pertains to audit within 6 months is an independent clause and doesn't have any mention of the state legislature.
Test 12, Q 49, statement two is also correct. "The state legislature may provide that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of the close of the financial year."
So correct option should be "c".
Pls clarify.
243ZN. Convening of general body meetings.—The Legislature of a Statemay, by law, make provisions that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of close of the financial year to transact the business as may be provided in such law.
SO it is not mandatory that meeting has to be there since state legislature may or may not provide for it.
http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/COI-updated-as-31072018.pdf Plz refer to this link for the said article.
Article 243ZM also says ".. state may by law,..." .
Same interpretation applies to both the provisions. Therefore, both options shall be incorrect by verbatim or both shall be correct by interpretation.
Please open the link file and search article 243ZM. The clause (1) and clause (2) of the article mention state legislature may provide. Clause (4) which pertains to audit within 6 months is an independent clause and doesn't have any mention of the state legislature.
Article 243ZM,Clause (4) is to be read independently, or as follows.. forClause (3): to be audited by an auditor or auditing firms referred to inClause (2)which is layed down by the Legislature of a State?
Test 12, Q 49, statement two is also correct. "The state legislature may provide that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of the close of the financial year."
So correct option should be "c".
Pls clarify.
243ZN. Convening of general body meetings.—The Legislature of a Statemay, by law, make provisions that the annual general body meeting of every co-operative society shall be convened within a period of six months of close of the financial year to transact the business as may be provided in such law.
SO it is not mandatory that meeting has to be there since state legislature may or may not provide for it.
http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/COI-updated-as-31072018.pdf Plz refer to this link for the said article.
Article 243ZM also says ".. state may by law,..." .
Same interpretation applies to both the provisions. Therefore, both options shall be incorrect by verbatim or both shall be correct by interpretation.
Please open the link file and search article 243ZM. The clause (1) and clause (2) of the article mention state legislature may provide. Clause (4) which pertains to audit within 6 months is an independent clause and doesn't have any mention of the state legislature.
Article 243ZM,Clause (4) is to be read independently, or as follows.. forClause (3): to be audited by an auditor or auditing firms referred to inClause (2)which is layed down by the Legislature of a State?
Each and Every clause is to be read independently unless and until it is referring to some other clause. For example,Cluse (3) clearly mentions clause (2)butclause (4) doesn't mention any other clauseand hence becomes independent. Similarly, clause(1) and (2) both mention the Stale legislature mayas both the clauses are independent.
Q 50
Answer has been changed from (b) to ( c).
As mentioned by@Lighthouse option (b) was discussed during discussion.
Please clarify.
The Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Bill, 2019, inter alia, provides
- that a person who has been a Judge of the Supreme Court is also made eligible to be appointed as Chairperson of the Commission in addition to the person who has been the Chief Justice of India;
https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192090
Thanks for the information. It was not much popular in recent news articles regarding the use rct in tax collection. Still as mentioned in sources it was useful in Congo and also in negative income tax collection so may be considered correct.