Subscribe to ForumIAS

Official: SFG / RLG All Tests Discussions in one place

Hello All,

The Group usage here is a little cumbersome, so I am creating this thread to make sure that all questions with doubts stay in one place. Can someone push all the doubts and queries here? I will make this an announcement?


-Faceless, Anonymous "root"

jack_Sparrow,curious_kidand56 otherslike this
494.9k views

1.4k comments

Test 20 Answer Key Issues

1. Ques. 2. 

Under the policy of ring-fence,  territories were not annexed, instead were continued to be under old heads, to serve as vassal state.

The same was discussed and agreed to in the post test discussion.

Correct option to be A.

2. Ques. 46

Treaty of Madras - 4 April 1769

Warren Hasting Governer General period - 1773-75

Hence, the correct answer should be A.

Post Test discussion also mentioned A as answer, whereas, the key says B.

Sir, kindly arrange for corrections in revised key.

@Thinker Sir, kindly arrange for corrections in revised key.

It has been taken care of and the revised answer key will be published soon.

SACHIN_SHARMA,
3k views

In ques 19 test 19

Freedom to enter into academic collaborations with other institutions inside the country is not a specific benefit w.r.t Institute of Eminence scheme since it's in general available to all UGC recognised institutions.

Rather IoE tag gives freedom to collaborate with international institutions.

Plz rectify.


"toenter into academic collaboration with top 500 in the world ranking Institutions without permission of UGC;"

https://pib.gov.in/newsite/printrelease.aspx?relid=180478


Clearly given in this article and there's as such no specific mention of "other institutions within the country"

Thanks and cheers.

@root @Thinker 

Statement 1 automatically implies statement 2. Once an institution has an administrative and academic autonomy it can enter into collaboration with any other institution as well. Anyways, for more elaboration plz refer to the link https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=193016. Please read point 7 under the heading of BENEFIT OF INSTITUTION OF EMINENCE.

_Rana_,TH14
3k views
@ranahere999 see. I think, in Bharat Ratna award, there is no exception, which says, it can be confreed to more that 3 people in certain circumstances.
Meaning, if at all it had been conferred to more that 3 ppl at a time it can be considered as an exception.
But the rule says, it can be conferred to not more than 3 people.

Whereas, Sardar patel award, the rule itself makes an exception, that it can be conferred in certain cases (though rare and exceptional) posthumously. 
So, the third statement of q.41 cannot be ruled out completely according to my understanding.


https://mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/Scheme-BR_1.pdf. Please refer to the link of the Ministry of Home Affairs.

3k views

Aks07said

Ques 18, Does E-NAM helps boost agriculture credit ?

Agriculture credit is basically money that is required for the overall growth of agriculture and personnel attached to it. It can be of two types i.e. Institutional (banks etc) or non-istitutional (Moneylenders or relatives etc.). e-NAM gives better pricing to farmers means farmers get surplus money which can be invested in Agricultural activities. Hence e-NAM has potential to boost agricultural credit. 

3k views
@Apurva321 im not sure about q.41.
Though ive never read that coal gassification plants have increased in India. 
I'd like to know whether or not that statement is incorrect, and  how.
I couldn't find any relevant information pertaining to that.
If you have, kindly share.


As per the answer key, only the 1st statement is right. 

3k views

so going by this. Q38, 3rd option says " its effect was limited to Bengal" , which should be the right option.

Bbut answer given is 1 &2 only are right.



TKindly clarify



_Rana_,
3.8k views

In Q.39

Option 1.: Satyashodhak samaj did talk about giving sense of identity to the depressed classes against "brahmins", and wanted complete abolishon of caste system.

Going by this, Satyashodhak samaj call for maratha homeland free of brahminical domination.

So option should be right



Option 2: Self Respect movement aimed at rejection of "brahminical religion", and not aryans.

Now, whether brahmins are aryans are not, is a seperate debate. How can we read brahmins=aryans?!

This option is a wrong one.


@Thinker .

Kindly clarify.

Just_relentless,
3.8k views

@Thinker @root 

Sir, 

 I wish to know whom should I mail regarding the result. I think some discrepancy is there in number of incorrect questions according to revised answer key in my case. 




3k views

@Thinker @root 

Sir, 

 I wish to know whom should I mail regarding the result. I think some discrepancy is there in number of incorrect questions according to revised answer key in my case. 




Please mail it to sfg@forumias.academy

SACHIN_SHARMA,
3k views

In Q.39

Option 1.: Satyashodhak samaj did talk about giving sense of identity to the depressed classes against "brahmins", and wanted complete abolishon of caste system.

Going by this, Satyashodhak samaj call for maratha homeland free of brahminical domination.

So option should be right



Option 2: Self Respect movement aimed at rejection of "brahminical religion", and not aryans.

Now, whether brahmins are aryans are not, is a seperate debate. How can we read brahmins=aryans?!

This option is a wrong one.


@Thinker .

Kindly clarify.

First of all Satyashodhak samajnever called forMaratha Homeland free of Brahminical domination. It was a reformist organization that called for theupliftment of downtrodden by providing them political and educational access.


Brahminical religion is another name given to Aryans or Vedic religion due to the overwhelming influence of Brahminical Varna over this religion. You should remember the Aryan or Vedic religion is a hierarchical one with Brahmins as the topmost Varna.

Just_relentless,TheMiddlePath
3k views

so going by this. Q38, 3rd option says " its effect was limited to Bengal" , which should be the right option.

Bbut answer given is 1 &2 only are right.



TKindly clarify



Sometimes data can be distorted. Brahmo Samaj's influence was limited to Bengal during the early years only. However, later on in Maharashtra Prarthana samaj was by Atmaram Panduran under influence of Brahmo Samaj. Similarly, Rajamuhundary Social Reform Association and Veda Samaj in Madras province were influenced by Brahmo Samaj. So as such the influence of Brahmo Samaj was not limited to Bengal.

Just_relentless,TheMiddlePath
3k views

@Thinker - Thankyou sir.

Thinker,
3.8k views

How is statement 1 correct in Question no 48 of test no21 since constitution mentioned English to be "used for allofficial purposefor a period of 15 years".


Being used for official purpose does not make it as an "official language of union".

As the statement says that "continuation of English as an official language of union" implies a different meaning from "used for all the official purposes of the Union".


Moreover we cannot distinguish in the exam that whether the question is being asked w.r.t Historical perspective (simple factual info)or political understanding( difference b/w being an official language or being used as language for official  specified purpose).

So statement 1 cannot be considered as correct.. plz clarify. 

2.5k views

Statement 2 is anyway wrong. It should've been Official languages act 1963.

3.8k views

How is statement 1 correct in Question no 48 of test no21 since constitution mentioned English to be "used for allofficial purposefor a period of 15 years".


Being used for official purpose does not make it as an "official language of union".

As the statement says that "continuation of English as an official language of union" implies a different meaning from "used for all the official purposes of the Union".


Moreover we cannot distinguish in the exam that whether the question is being asked w.r.t Historical perspective (simple factual info)or political understanding( difference b/w being an official language or being used as language for official  specified purpose).

So statement 1 cannot be considered as correct.. plz clarify. 

@Thinker 

2.5k views

How is statement 1 correct in Question no 48 of test no21 since constitution mentioned English to be "used for allofficial purposefor a period of 15 years".


Being used for official purpose does not make it as an "official language of union".

As the statement says that "continuation of English as an official language of union" implies a different meaning from "used for all the official purposes of the Union".


Moreover we cannot distinguish in the exam that whether the question is being asked w.r.t Historical perspective (simple factual info)or political understanding( difference b/w being an official language or being used as language for official  specified purpose).

So statement 1 cannot be considered as correct.. plz clarify. 

@Thinker 

343. Official language of the Union

(1) The official language of the Union shall be Hindi in Devanagari script The form of numerals to be used for the official purposes of the Union shall be the international form of Indian numerals
(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause ( 1 ), for a period of fifteen years from the commencement of this Constitution, the English language shall continue to be used for all the official purposes of the Unionfor which it was being used immediately before such commencement:Provided that the president may, during the said period, by order authorize the use of the Hindi language in addition to the English language and of the Devanagari form of numerals in addition to the international form of Indian numerals for any of the official purposes of the Union
(3) Notwithstanding anything in this article, Parliament may by law provide for the use, after the said period of fifteen years, of
(a) the English language, or
(b) the Devanagari form of numerals, for such purposes as may be specified in the law

The statement says provided for (and not mention) English to be continued as an official language of the Union. Clause 2 of this article (which I have highlighted in bold) clearly implies statement 1.
_Rana_,Mzp6628and2 otherslike this
3k views

@Thinker @root 

Test 022 Q 24

In this question the second statement is ,"Surya is shown riding a chariot driven bytwo horses."


Since the chariot of Surya is driven by7 horseswith each having their own significancethis statement become incorrect.

  Due to this it's answer should be option (b) instead of (d). Please clarify.

3k views
It is not necessary that Surya's chariot has to be driven by 7 horses. Only contemporary images of Surya's Chariot are depicted with 7 horses. Throughout history, the number of horses has been fluctuating. For example, the Mahabodhi Temple of Bihar shows Surya's Chariot driven by 4 horses and various Mathura images show his chariot driven by 2 horses.
SACHIN_SHARMA,
3k views
Thanks sir for this insightful information.


Thinker,
3k views

Test 22 , Q. 3 

Statement no 1 states that 'Vishnu's image as Vaikuntha Chaturmurti if found in Kandariya Mahadev Temple' and the answer key states this to be correct. 

However, Kandariya Mahadev Temple is a Shiva temple and this image of Vishnu is found in Lakshmana Temple of Khajuraho. 

I think the answer should be 2 Only (B) instead of Both 1 and 2 (C) 


2.9k views
Write your comment…