PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Western Political Thought

Comment on the Hobbesian notion of Political Obligation in 150 words

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 define obligation (duty to obey state/law) stake: nearly unlimited, self-imposed to flee war of all against all

Route 2 start from fear / state of nature escape needs one final authority obedience is the price of peace

Body flow

covenant as ground Ebenstein: sovereign is the creation, not a party; pact is among subjects each authorises sovereign’s acts as his own disobedience contradicts one’s own will relapse into state of nature

Counter-view

obligation not blind holds only while sovereign protects life self-preservation inalienable no duty to obey a command of self-destruction

Conclusion routes

Route 1 ground debated: Taylor’s prudence vs Warrender’s natural law fear + consent + duty, yet bounded by right to live

Route 2 obligation strong but conditional protection is the real measure individual never fully absorbed by Leviathan

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2017, Western Political Thought