PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1

Discuss the rationale behind replacing the “Asia- Pacific” strategy with the new term “Indo-Pacific” strategy.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Asia-Pacific: 1960s origin, APEC 1980s → rim-centred map, India outside, Indian Ocean read apart → renaming = deciding who counts

Route 2 a region is a strategic choice, not a coastline → the old map left out India and the Indian Ocean → the new name written to bring India in

Body flow

Hormuz + Malacca, half of maritime oil trade → India’s weight cannot sit off the map → Khurana 2007, alternative that takes India in → Abe’s confluence, Australian + American support → both oceans one theatre → Quad’s premise → India past South Asia

Counter-view

resistance mirrors adoption → Beijing prefers Asia-Pacific, keeps China central → Moscow: artificial → Chacko: trade density stayed Asia-Pacific, region built from anxiety over China, India as balancer

Conclusion routes

Route 1 strategic, not cartographic → 2025 NSS hemisphere first, 2026 NDS deterrence second-order → the name holds only while the strategy is funded

Route 2 renaming decided who counts → India gained standing, China lost centrality → a map survives on its sponsors’ investment, not on its logic

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2024, India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1