PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1

The natural behaviour of India and the United States is likely to serve each other’s interests. Hence, a deliberate strategy of dovetailing their efforts will obviously benefit both. Elaborate.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Nehru, 1949, natural allies fifty years of distance Kux, estranged democracies shared democracy settled nothing

Route 2 naturalness is structural, not sentimental structure changed, behaviour converged dovetailing pays as far as structure holds

Body flow

China’s rise is the structure Varshney’s new triangle, first courts the third India’s security search + America’s balance search overlap needs no planning Menon, unstated but China-driven deliberate effort converts overlap into capability 1990s dovetailing with engagement and enlargement Act East + rebalance on one line Major Defence Partner, foundational agreements, iCET, F414 defence trade under $1bn (2008) to over $25bn (mid-2025)

Counter-view

the certainty overreaches Hagerty, ally’s treatment without alliance complications over China avoided neo-nonalignment as default Himalayan doubt S-400, tariffs, visas

Conclusion routes

Route 1 pays where practical: technology, maritime security, supply chains weakens where continental threats meet global priorities

Route 2 Pant, key partner at a principled distance entente, not alliance, is the form that fits

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2017, India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1