PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1

The natural behaviour of India and the United States is likely to serve each other’s interests. Hence, a deliberate strategy of dovetailing their efforts will obviously benefit both. Elaborate.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Nehru, 1949, natural allies → fifty years of distance → Kux, estranged democracies → shared democracy settled nothing

Route 2 naturalness is structural, not sentimental → structure changed, behaviour converged → dovetailing pays as far as structure holds

Body flow

China’s rise is the structure → Varshney’s new triangle, first courts the third → India’s security search + America’s balance search → overlap needs no planning → Menon, unstated but China-driven → deliberate effort converts overlap into capability → 1990s dovetailing with engagement and enlargement → Act East + rebalance on one line → Major Defence Partner, foundational agreements, iCET, F414 → defence trade under $1bn (2008) to over $25bn (mid-2025)

Counter-view

the certainty overreaches → Hagerty, ally’s treatment without alliance → complications over China avoided → neo-nonalignment as default → Himalayan doubt → S-400, tariffs, visas

Conclusion routes

Route 1 pays where practical: technology, maritime security, supply chains → weakens where continental threats meet global priorities

Route 2 Pant, key partner at a principled distance → entente, not alliance, is the form that fits

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2017, India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1