PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1

Discuss the significance of Indo-US strategic partnership and its implications for India’s security and national defence.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 estrangement to entente (Hagerty) close in practice, no treaty obligation autonomy kept, defence stays India’s own responsibility

Route 2 what changed is Indian military capability, not American obligation so measure the partnership in capability, not guarantees

Body flow

foundational architecture mapped one-to-one (GSOMIA information security LEMOA logistics COMCASA secure communication BECA geospatial data, navigation, precision targeting) Major Defence Partner 2016 + STA-1 2018, technology release eased western Indian Ocean cooperation vs Gwadar and Djibouti the sharper question: capability or only inventory Panetta 2012, move beyond buyer-seller October 2025 ten-year Framework as the formal answer: co-production in surveillance, undersea domain awareness, munitions; India as regional maintenance hub

Counter-view

Pant and Mishra: pressure to buy may pull it back into the buyer-seller pattern rejected in 2015 Pant and Bommakanti: 2026 NDS names India nowhere, silent on the Quad as security provider commitment cannot be assumed

Conclusion routes

Route 1 deterrence raised, not underwritten value equals what India absorbs and builds

Route 2 Staniland: hard-pressed power the binding limit sits in Indian capacity, not in American intent

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2020, India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1