PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · India & South Asia — Part 2

How does cross border terrorism impede the achievements of peace and security in South Asia?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 terrorism as state policy, not law-and-order problem 1971 turn to asymmetric balancing Bhutto’s strategic depth + Zia’s thousand cuts peace blocked at source

Route 2 Pahalgam one attack puts a treaty that outlived three wars in abeyance the instrument is policy, not crime peace blocked at source

Body flow

Tellis: plausible deniability + a war Pakistan cannot win + nuclear deterrent as licence India’s dual denial: no decisive victory, no regional pre-eminence cost turns regional no SAARC summit since 2014 Bangladesh, Bhutan, Afghanistan abandon Islamabad with India after Uri counter-terror work moves to BIMSTEC, Pakistan out Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance since Pahalgam Pant: engagement now conditioned by Pakistan’s behaviour

Counter-view

coercion has not changed the incentive Cohen: a stalemate neither side can win nor absorb each retaliation carries escalation risk

Conclusion routes

Route 1 Pakistan’s own war with the Afghan Taliban since February 2026 strategy turning on its author South Asia insecure while terrorism remains policy

Route 2 SAARC dead, BIMSTEC a workaround, Indus Treaty in abeyance whole regional order now shaped by one strategy peace waits on that strategy being given up

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2020, India & South Asia — Part 2