PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Making of the Constitution

Indian Constitution is a ‘Lawyers’ Paradise’ — Ivor Jennings

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Jennings’s “lawyer’s paradise” = a real feature of the text → length, legalism, complexity → read as a flaw

Route 2 label true of the form → but the detail was a design choice, not a defect

Body flow

why Jennings said it → unusually long + detailed + technical legal language + administrative provisions → many framers were lawyers → Maheshwari himself concedes → detail invites litigation → distances the ordinary citizen

Counter-view

detail was a deliberate safeguard → diversity + untested democracy → precision to prevent arbitrariness and misuse → Ambedkar: the text can be perverted, so protections had to be spelt out

Conclusion routes

Route 1 description fits the form, not its purpose

Route 2 detailed text has held for decades → gave India a stable order

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2013, Making of the Constitution