[Results] Prelims 2020 Over - Gearing for 2021
Because of the corona virus issue? If it does not happen then worst affected will be people whose interview is stuck, around 600-700 such people I think are yet to appear for their interview.
@neyawn sir and others, what is your take?
This is the official Thread for discussion of Prelims Postponement, Please do not create new threads for the same.
Kya lagaatar tukkebaaji years yaar 2018,19,20. UPSC lagta hain lottery IAS lene ka mann kar raha hain! didnt they produce any valuable IAS with old pattern in last 60 years? :D :D :D
We are always victims of pattern change in all the exams. If you born i. 1990s to 1995 ... You are part of change..so be it in UPSC. Saare experiment jindagi ke hamare time pe hi hone the.
Masum_Ladka,@gauravbrly409 Read older pages.Blockchain is picked verbatim from a source.Its 1&3
Can you quote the URL. I will be very happy. I will gain 2.67.
@beginn371316 bhai, constitution clearly provides for judicial review! wo toh basic structure hain. SC invented Basic structure but kept things in constitution in basic structure only not the outside things of constitution. So basic structure in invented by SC not in Constitution. Judicial Review is in constitution and SC shields or protects it by keeping it in basic structure. simple as that.
Judicial review is also not explicitly written if we go by law of verbatims.
Constitution *provides* ... Yes it provides.
Constitution defines ... Sounds dubious now.
Kya kare... Yaar Angrezi ka course kar le next time .
Confusion hi confusion hai. !!
Provides Judicial review in inverted commas pushed me to mark D. Banta questions galat ho gya English k chakkar me
Exactly same thing happened with me too Bro! I can sense your dilemma.Moreover,first option going wrong added to the woes and I thought that UPSC is playing along the same lines in 2nd option too!
Kahi aisa na ho both statement may be false.
@gauravbrly409 what have u marked for cyberinsurance?
willingly break computer ... i took it as wrong. Rest all correct.
Article 32 debates as per book "cornerstone of nation by godwin Austin "clearly mentions Ambedkar views on inclusion of judicial review as per USA and in article 13 and Article 32 there is a concept of judicial review ....in the constitution there is provision of judicial review but it's the supreme court which has time and again elaborated this and made judicial review as basic structure of constitution...however basic structure concept is not given originally in constitution and hence second is correct
Bhai ,simple si ek kitaab h Lakshmikant Naam ki .Usme judicial review Naam ka chapter h .Use pad lo .Question related saare doubts door ho jaenge .
@gauravbrly409 I don't remember U have to search 2 days previous posts.But it's settled.It was verbatim.I can't find U specific page number.
Ok .. I can understand. But .. ab kaun itna peeche jaaye. . Let it be.
Aspirant123,@Equalizer Gandhi Irwin Delete nahi karega. I don't think so. Every year something happens with translation.Preamble is very much debatable. A or D. I marked C :D But A ka chances jyaada hain.If it's a part of constitution and if it is not justiciable strictly and as mentioned in Laxmikanth - Then It should be A. baaki coaching waala v sahi reason de nahi paa rahe hain.SC kya bola bhai? Kaha bola only dependent on others hi hain nahi toh koi legal effect nahi bolke? Its all speculation. but lets see.If its a part why it shouldnot have any legal effect if any one deletes somepart without affecting basic structure? means no body can approach court if something happens to preamble only?If u apply rules stricly then its A. non justificiable.
If Gandhi irwin is not deleted everyone would be awarded marks. It's the same thing.
In preamble question IMO legality is not synonyms with justiciability, it can be used by the court to decide constitutionality of legislation. This is what I understood. Rest upsc is boss.
If legal effect is not synonyms with Justiciability ... Then .. Option C is most appropriate.
Otherwise .. I go for D.
No. Outside other part it has no legality. Only when some part of the constitution is given effect mainly DPSP, preamble comes into play.
Article 32 debates as per book "cornerstone of nation by godwin Austin "clearly mentions Ambedkar views on inclusion of judicial review as per USA and in article 13 and Article 32 there is a concept of judicial review ....in the constitution there is provision of judicial review but it's the supreme court which has time and again elaborated this and made judicial review as basic structure of constitution...however basic structure concept is not given originally in constitution and hence second is correctBhai ,simple si ek kitaab h Lakshmikant Naam ki .Usme judicial review Naam ka chapter h .Use pad lo .Question related saare doubts door ho jaenge .
HBTI se ho kya ???
@Equalizer Gandhi Irwin Delete nahi karega. I don't think so. Every year something happens with translation.Preamble is very much debatable. A or D. I marked C :D But A ka chances jyaada hain.If it's a part of constitution and if it is not justiciable strictly and as mentioned in Laxmikanth - Then It should be A. baaki coaching waala v sahi reason de nahi paa rahe hain.SC kya bola bhai? Kaha bola only dependent on others hi hain nahi toh koi legal effect nahi bolke? Its all speculation. but lets see.If its a part why it shouldnot have any legal effect if any one deletes somepart without affecting basic structure? means no body can approach court if something happens to preamble only?If u apply rules stricly then its A. non justificiable.
If Gandhi irwin is not deleted everyone would be awarded marks. It's the same thing.
In preamble question IMO legality is not synonyms with justiciability, it can be used by the court to decide constitutionality of legislation. This is what I understood. Rest upsc is boss.
If legal effect is not synonyms with Justiciability ... Then .. Option C is most appropriate.
Otherwise .. I go for D.
No. Outside other part it has no legality. Only when some part of the constitution is given effect mainly DPSP, preamble comes into play.
Apan ko vishwas nahi ho raha ki itne saal isme bi confusion hi rah gaya !!
Article 32 debates as per book "cornerstone of nation by godwin Austin "clearly mentions Ambedkar views on inclusion of judicial review as per USA and in article 13 and Article 32 there is a concept of judicial review ....in the constitution there is provision of judicial review but it's the supreme court which has time and again elaborated this and made judicial review as basic structure of constitution...however basic structure concept is not given originally in constitution and hence second is correctBhai ,simple si ek kitaab h Lakshmikant Naam ki .Usme judicial review Naam ka chapter h .Use pad lo .Question related saare doubts door ho jaenge .
HBTI se ho kya ???
Tabhi Harcourtian h
gauravbrly409,
Equalizer,Article 32 debates as per book "cornerstone of nation by godwin Austin "clearly mentions Ambedkar views on inclusion of judicial review as per USA and in article 13 and Article 32 there is a concept of judicial review ....in the constitution there is provision of judicial review but it's the supreme court which has time and again elaborated this and made judicial review as basic structure of constitution...however basic structure concept is not given originally in constitution and hence second is correctBhai ,simple si ek kitaab h Lakshmikant Naam ki .Usme judicial review Naam ka chapter h .Use pad lo .Question related saare doubts door ho jaenge .
HBTI se ho kya ???
Bhai Marks kab tak aenge last Mains ke ...kuch andaja h?
@Equalizer I strongly feel that it cannot be D.They have just given option D to confuse just like in AI (Wireless).Its a more over blunt question. Preamble is either a part or not. its a part. donePreamble does have legal effect or not. It doesnt have or it does have. done and dusted.No more diplomatic answers. SC never said anything about it. It interprets constitution taking preamble context but when it comes to legal effect. there are only two options. it does or doesn't. there is no diplomatic answer.I guess answer will be A.
Bench bulao 13 judges ki to ab is question pe.
Sankoza,Equalizer
Write your comment…
