PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1

“India and USA have become such strong strategic partners that they need not become formal allies.” Comment.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Hagerty’s entente → informal, outside treaty, flexible on what support is owed → treatment of an ally without the status of one

Route 2 claim right about where the partnership stands → wrong about why alliance stays away → obligation is the price India will not pay

Body flow

partnership delivers most of what alliance would → GSOMIA / LEMOA / COMCASA / BECA → interoperability without Article-5 → ten-year Framework, Oct 2025 → what alliance adds is obligation → freedom of manoeuvre + non-aligned record → Parpiani and Pant, autonomy through partnerships → Jaishankar, partner not subordinate ally

Counter-view

the design has a price → 2025 tariffs at fifty per cent, half for Russian oil → framework signed while tariffs stood → February 2026 reset to eighteen → Pant and Bommakanti, 2026 NDS silent on India and the Quad

Conclusion routes

Route 1 alliance would not have stopped the tariffs → a burden-shifting Washington promises little more

Route 2 India’s reply was capability and hedging, not a treaty → deep in capability, shallow in obligation, both prefer it there

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2024, India & the Global Centres of Power — Part 1