PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · India & the Nuclear Question

“India’s Nuclear policy is deeply influenced by its cultural beliefs and the pragmatic approach of its foreign policy.’ Discuss.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 security alone never explained the bomb → two roots: cultural aversion (restraint) + pragmatism (arsenal)

Route 2 moral repugnance from the freedom movement vs hard security necessity → culture restrains, pragmatism arms

Body flow

freedom-movement tradition (Gandhi / Nehru / Tagore) + NWFW → Rajagopalan “necessary evil” → Hall’s Nehruvian “restraint, stability, minimalism” → Menon: NFU a cultural choice → security triggers (China 1964, Pakistan, lost Soviet umbrella) → Raja Mohan’s calculated choice → Pant’s strategic ambiguity → 2003 doctrine embodies both (CMD / de-mated / NFU = restraint; NCA / SFC / triad = capability) → realism = hedge, constructivism = identity → post-Pahalgam 2025 Operation Sindoor “new normal” → Chauhan: high threshold, space below → Raja Mohan: ambiguity vs full-spectrum deterrence → NFU still intact

Counter-view

pragmatism straining the cultural restraint: expansionist pull to dilute NFU / doctrinal ambiguity / counterforce — set against the enduring moral aversion and the NWFW ideal

Conclusion routes

Route 1 principled realism → culture gives restraint + vision, pragmatism gives weapons + diplomacy

Route 2 not either half but the balance (Hall: realism tempered by moral belief) → that synthesis defines India’s path

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2023, India & the Nuclear Question