PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · State in Comparative Perspective

Describe the changing nature of the State in the developing societies in the context of inclusive growth in the 21st century.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 developing State = apparatus inherited from colonial rule early form concentrated growth, ill-suited to inclusion

Route 2 nature has since shifted from a structure that monopolised development to one built for inclusive growth

Body flow

Myrdal’s soft state: no social discipline, spares the rich non-inclusive Riggs’s prismatic society / bazaar-canteen favours the wealthy, family-community monopolise development Alavi’s overdeveloped state atop a transitional socio-economic base shift from state-led development market reforms (India’s mixed-market model; China’s capitalist economy under a socialist polity) globalization aggravates inequality (99% vs 1%, social unrest) 21st-century inclusion turn: participative culture, ICT / JAM-Jan Dhan; RTI strengthens the political arena; welfare + affirmative action structural change developmental-state debate: inclusive growth rests on state capacity to penetrate society (East Asia)

Counter-view

market-led globalization deepened inequality; the soft / overdeveloped state’s incapacity to discipline elites limits how far the inclusion turn can reach

Conclusion routes

Route 1 nature moved from a soft, elite-shielding apparatus an active enabler of inclusion

Route 2 the inclusion turn is real but conditional holds only where the State can discipline the powerful / build developmental capacity

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2018, State in Comparative Perspective