PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · The United Nations

Do you endorse that the United Nations needs major changes in its structures and functioning? Suggest the changes for efficient improvements.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Hammarskjöld’s minimum test (save humanity from hell) Rwanda / Srebrenica / Darfur fall below even that endorse major change

Route 2 Joel Ng: legitimacy = representation + effectiveness UN short on both so structures and functioning both need change

Body flow

Council’s composition frozen at 1945 no permanent seat for Africa / Latin America veto converts P5 rivalry into paralysis (Syria, Ukraine) same fault runs into functioning: no standing army, borrowed troops, slow deployment, funding shortfalls Barnett: reactive, not preventive hence remedies on both tracks structure: expand both categories (Africa, Latin America, India), Annan’s 24-member plan, restrain the veto, greater decision-making weight for the General Assembly functioning: peacekeeping peacebuilding, quicker deployment, Sachs on merging/closing overlapping programmes, Secretariat transparency + independent oversight

Counter-view

Weiss: entrenched interests will not concede reform without a burden-sharing bargain UN80 (2026): posts cut 21%, Council composition untouched efficiency can be administered, representation must be conceded Guterres himself: status quo “untenable”

Conclusion routes

Route 1 Vajpayee: UN only as effective as members allow reform begins at the top, in the Council, or the body goes moribund

Route 2 managerial reform without Council reform leaves the veto intact representation remains the test of a credible UN

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2016, The United Nations