PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Recent Developments in Foreign Policy — Part 2

How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India’s foreign policy choices?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 autonomy = freedom of decision, not standing apart Israel ties the sharpest live test

Route 2 India deepens Israel while holding Arab/Iran/Palestine simultaneity, not closeness, proves autonomy

Body flow

de-hyphenation, separate tracks judged on merit Taneja: balancing/hedging/mediating in a fraying order + Sebastian: engaging all sides 1950 recognition / 1992 full ties / Modi 2017 by choice, not bloc issue-based cooperation for payoff (Barak-8, 27 CoEs, Haifa, IMEC/I2U2) Hameed: bilateral minilateral Jaishankar: most-trusted partner set inside a multipolar world of autonomous decision-centres autonomy under pressure (Palestine aid, settlement votes, June 2025 abstention, Global South) Gupta: Palestine anchoring + P.P. Singh: strategic neutrality in 2025 crisis

Counter-view

de-hyphenation as drift from Palestine solidarity toward Israel reciprocity (peer-reviewed) Haidar: abstentionism ambiguous US–Israel tilt vs genuine independence

Conclusion routes

Route 1 values-based partnership converted into strategic asset while retaining freedom to decide

Route 2 in a fracturing order, calibration is autonomy’s proof, not its erosion

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2022, Recent Developments in Foreign Policy — Part 2