PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Social Movements

Comment on Women’s role in anti-arrack movement.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Locate: AP, early 1990s, a rural women’s uprising → born in Dubagunta, Nellore from the National Literacy Campaign → women name arrack → women as central actors, private grievance → public struggle.

Route 2 Open on agency: unlettered rural women, no political experience → move household suffering into political action → force the state to act → the “comment” weighs the significance of that leadership.

Body flow

Literacy-campaign origin → women link alcohol to domestic violence / financial ruin / social breakdown → forms of action (marches, picketing, night patrols, sit-ins, processions, brewing material destroyed, fines) → opponents: liquor contractors + the state’s Varun Vahini → feminist reading: Tharu & Lalitha (patriarchy at home + in public) → Mazumdar (rural women changing policy = a turning point) → ‘the personal is the political’.

Counter-view

Weigh the mismatch: inexperienced, unlettered rural women vs powerful liquor contractors + the state’s own Varun Vahini patronage → that ordinary women overturned this nexus is what makes their role significant.

Conclusion routes

Route 1 Outcome: CM Kotla Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy bans arrack, 1 Oct 1993 → women without formal power reshaped state policy.

Route 2 Close on scale: one of the largest women-led agitations against the state → women as agents of grassroots democracy.

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2024, Social Movements