PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Social Movements

Critically analyse the environmentalist movement in Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Locate the movement → grassroots environmental-justice struggle against Sterlite Copper (Vedanta), Thoothukudi → resistance since the 1990s, peaked 2018 → demand = closure over pollution and health.

Route 2 Frame as a poor-community struggle defending livelihood and health against a polluting plant the state had cleared where others refused.

Body flow

Grievance documented — NEERI report 2011 (copper, lead, cadmium, fluoride in groundwater) + 2013 gas leak → CSE: three states rejected the plant first + faulty EIA → state cleared what others refused (governance failure) → popular base: fisher folk, Dalits, small farmers, women, church groups, students; women as moral voices → social media mobilised 100,000+, challenged official narratives → TNPCB clearance rejected but construction continued → police firing, eleven dead → environmental justice tied to democratic rights → Sahu: reinforcing Swaraj and democracy.

Counter-view

Narain’s fire-fighting critique → closure achieved, development model left untouched → weak environmental governance persists.

Conclusion routes

Route 1 A real victory for environmental justice and an exposure of governance failure, but bounded by an unchanged development model.

Route 2 Success and limit are the same fact → one plant closed, the paradigm that breeds such conflicts intact.

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2018, Social Movements