PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Social Movements

Critically analyse the environmentalist movement in Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Locate the movement grassroots environmental-justice struggle against Sterlite Copper (Vedanta), Thoothukudi resistance since the 1990s, peaked 2018 demand = closure over pollution and health.

Route 2 Frame as a poor-community struggle defending livelihood and health against a polluting plant the state had cleared where others refused.

Body flow

Grievance documented — NEERI report 2011 (copper, lead, cadmium, fluoride in groundwater) + 2013 gas leak CSE: three states rejected the plant first + faulty EIA state cleared what others refused (governance failure) popular base: fisher folk, Dalits, small farmers, women, church groups, students; women as moral voices social media mobilised 100,000+, challenged official narratives TNPCB clearance rejected but construction continued police firing, eleven dead environmental justice tied to democratic rights Sahu: reinforcing Swaraj and democracy.

Counter-view

Narain’s fire-fighting critique closure achieved, development model left untouched weak environmental governance persists.

Conclusion routes

Route 1 A real victory for environmental justice and an exposure of governance failure, but bounded by an unchanged development model.

Route 2 Success and limit are the same fact one plant closed, the paradigm that breeds such conflicts intact.

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2018, Social Movements