PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Comparative Politics

Discuss the subject matter of comparative politics. Outline the limitations of comparative political analysis.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 CP defined by method, not substance (Lijphart) → subject matter is fluid, widening as the discipline grows

Route 2 comparison as the analytical core → what it compares expands from institutions to the whole political process

Body flow

traditional subject matter: formal institutions/constitutions/forms of government, mostly Western → modern shift to political processes + behaviour → systems & functional analysis → political culture, civic attitudes (Almond & Verba) → political economy (economics–politics) → political sociology (state–society) → class structures + modes of production + developing world

Counter-view

Macridis: parochial/ethnocentric/static → modern approaches: jargon + abstraction; Marxists: status-quoist + Western-centric → selection bias/many variables/scarce data weaken objectivity → Chandhoke: loss of certainties strains a grand-theory field → over-comparison erases the uniqueness of states

Conclusion routes

Route 1 limitations real but not disabling → CP still widens political science beyond the West, aids theory-building

Route 2 the same breadth that limits also enriches → value lies in comparison handled with care, against conceptual stretching

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2020, Comparative Politics