PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · India & the Non-Aligned Movement

Does the Non-Aligned Movement have any future in the wake of India’s growing indifference towards it?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 NAM born 1961 new states clear of both blocs sovereignty + equitable development India’s absence real, future turns on NAM’s own reform

Route 2 absence from recent summits = post-1991 shift to multi-alignment the question is NAM’s condition, not India’s attendance

Body flow

decline predates India’s drift C. Raja Mohan: meaning lost before the Cold War ended, failed to shape events 120-plus members, fragmented priorities no permanent secretariat agenda absorbed by African Union / ASEAN / BRICS but small and marginalised states still need a voice M.K. Narayanan: collective voice on global issues global governance + UN reform T.V. Paul: space for soft balancing, onus on smaller countries future conditional on reform Harsh V. Pant: “old shibboleths”, no new goals Keethaponcalan: permanent secretariat + selective engagement in place of non-cooperation

Counter-view

NAM a spent force (no achievement, no machinery, regional bodies took over the agenda) vs NAM the one collective platform left to weaker states

Conclusion routes

Route 1 a future exists, but a reformed one India’s absence weakens the platform, does not decide it

Route 2 the decline was NAM’s own reform of agenda and structure settles the question, not India’s return

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2025, India & the Non-Aligned Movement