PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · South Asia: Regionalism, SAARC & BIMSTEC

What are the reasons for lack of ‘regionness’ in South Asia?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 regionness is a degree, not a fact of geography (Hettne–Söderbaum) → the level can fall as well as rise → South Asia: a region’s material, not its politics

Route 2 the material is shared, the politics is not → because the founding act of these states was separation

Body flow

separation as the founding act (Partition, 1971, their wars) → national identity becomes a claim against a neighbour → Muni: non-Indian identity converting into anti-India sentiment → Pakistan: a working SAARC undoes partition → asymmetry (75% GDP, 70% people) → integration reads as dominance → institutional design (consensus rule + bilateral disputes excluded) → one quarrel halts the rest → no summit since 2014, trade near 5% → the level still falling (IWT in abeyance since April 2025; Dhaka asking for SAARC at a BIMSTEC table, July 2026)

Counter-view

the region does work where politics permits → Nepal’s power to Bangladesh across the Indian grid, season after season → the deficit is political, not natural

Conclusion routes

Route 1 displaced, not absent → these states draw legitimacy from standing apart

Route 2 the region moves wherever politics allows it to → what is missing is a decision, not a basis

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2023, South Asia: Regionalism, SAARC & BIMSTEC