PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · South Asia: Regionalism, SAARC & BIMSTEC

What are the implications of “Look-East’ Policy on the north-eastern region of India?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 1991 turn east after Soviet collapse policy changed the region’s status, sealed frontier transit space

Route 2 region practically landlocked Look East made connectivity itself the Northeast’s development policy

Body flow

first implication, economic: sea access via Siliguri or Bangladesh DoNER budget ₹562.78 cr (2014–15) ₹2,657.87 cr (2019–20) second implication, dependence: future on corridors = future on territory India does not govern Raja Mohan, slow implementation + weak connectivity Misri, June 2026, Kaladan and trilateral highway stalled by security situation inside Myanmar third implication, inward: ~220 ethnic groups, autonomy-to-statehood demands, corridors cross that ground FMR scrapped + ten-year fencing plan, 1,643 km line opened for cargo, hardened for kin Manipur carries the highway, under President’s Rule till Feb 2026

Counter-view

policy not the culprit MP-IDSA 2026: credible, institutionalised presence; success turns on execution, not intent Baruah: development spending and armed conflict coexisted well before 1991

Conclusion routes

Route 1 change of status is real develops the region only where land, security, identity are settled

Route 2 where they are not settled, the corridor merely passes through the region

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2022, South Asia: Regionalism, SAARC & BIMSTEC