PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Changing International Political Order

Critically examine the decline of the United States of America as a hegemon and its implications for the changing international political order.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 hegemony = material dominance + consent Gramsci: leadership by consent vs by force verdict staked: decline real but partial consent weakens faster than capability

Route 2 the peak was short (1989 2007-09 crash) Gilpin’s fragile pillars what cracked first is legitimacy, not capability

Body flow

primacy built: containment / critical technologies / military reach / dollar’s reserve status brief peak 1989–2007-09 Gilpin: fragile pillars = dollar + MNCs + nuclear weapons markers of decline: 9/11 2008 crisis (neoliberalism’s limits) Afghanistan 2021 Russia–Ukraine erosion deepest at the consent pillar de-dollarisation (China, Russia, India, Iran, Saudi Arabia) AIIB / NDB rival Bretton Woods China across UN agencies

Counter-view

capability is another matter Strange: structural power (military, international credit, services, dollar, education) Zakaria: still unrivalled in many spheres adaptation, not collapse, decides the future

Conclusion routes

Route 1 no handover: West Asia, unipolarity multipolarity, no successor hegemon Allison’s “Thucydides Trap” order open to rivalry and economic shocks Keohane: an order can outlive its hegemon

Route 2 Behuria: “Multipolarity is what the states make of it” widened strategic autonomy for India but room for strong powers to bend norms

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2021, Changing International Political Order