PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Changing International Political Order

The changing global order and ongoing regional conflicts, with the global powers taking sides, have

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 disarmament was a product of structure parity + dialogue + shared institutions those supports withdrawn statement holds

Route 2 past gains came when rivals could still bargain present order removes the bargaining floor jeopardy is real

Body flow

détente converts parity into treaties (SALT, ABM, hotline, START) non-aligned push carries PTBT 1963 that machinery gone both arsenals modernising New START lapse (Feb 2026), no cap in fifty-plus years CTBT / FMCT / 2017 ban treaty blocked or boycotted Ukraine destroys parity, dialogue, institutions side-taking in regional wars: West Asia arms supplies + Iran–Saudi South Asia standoff doubtful US umbrella Japan / South Korea / Gulf may revisit non-nuclear status (Perkovich & Acton) side-taking spreads weapons

Counter-view

failure predates these wars Simpson: under-delivery since the 1990s, blocked by the nuclear powers themselves Mearsheimer: a thin order still carries arms control

Conclusion routes

Route 1 machinery of bargaining collapsed; restraint has not India’s No First Use verifiable, non-discriminatory framework

Route 2 the statement describes a real reversal, not a permanent fate rebuild the missing supports: verification, non-discrimination, dialogue

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2024, Changing International Political Order