PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Regionalisation of World Politics

Evaluate the role of BIMSTEC in multi-sectoral technical and economic cooperation.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 mandate written into the name Bangkok Declaration 1997, South + Southeast Asia verdict staked: works as a technical body, disappoints as an economic one /

Route 2 BIMSTEC as a functional experiment sector-by-sector design, each member leading one judge it against its own promise

Body flow

Mitrany’s functional method technical cooperation breeds habits of collaboration the gains are real: grid-interconnection MoU technology-transfer facility marine and climate research Kaladan Multimodal Charter + Bangkok Vision, late by two decades turn to rules-based regionalism but the economic half is missing: no FTA low intra-regional trade unfunded Development Fund weak Secretariat

Counter-view

Muni & Khatri: the project-based method was built to complement SAARC defence fair but incomplete Haas: spillover needs political participation De: political will, stronger institutions, steady implementation

Conclusion routes

Route 1 technical mandate delivered, economic one postponed a funded Secretariat and a real FTA will decide its worth /

Route 2 design sound, politics missing BIMSTEC works as a functional platform, not yet as an economic community

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2019, Regionalisation of World Politics