PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Regionalisation of World Politics

How has ‘BREXIT’ affected the regionalisation process initiated by European Union and what could be its likely impacts in the regionalisation process of world politics?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 EU as deepest integration Haas’s spillover expectation Britain’s 2016 vote moves the other way cost without refutation; terms of regionalism change /

Route 2 Brexit as the first live test of pooled sovereignty scale and confidence lost inside Europe example carried outward

Body flow

loss of a major economy and political player collective strength weakened Moravcsik: exit precedent Euroscepticism (National Rally, AfD) Hix: new trade barriers + regulatory divergence complicate integration turn outward: example matters more than the loss Thompson: “regionalism is out, sovereignty back in”; regionalism as ideological contest, not rational choice with US pressure on NAFTA protectionism encouraged weaker projects exposed (SAARC, RCEP) Acharya: separatist / nationalist movements emboldened ASEAN, MERCOSUR strained out of the EU but not NATO economic regionalism separable from security

Counter-view

limits of supranationalism real, but retreat narrower than predicted no domino; pro-EU turn in France EU firmness makes exit costly sovereignty pooled, never surrendered; members always free to leave exit illustrates the design as much as it damages it

Conclusion routes

Route 1 Brexit as a demand for reform EU deepened after losing a major power /

Route 2 regionalism continues, on more contested terms sovereignty balanced against collective benefit

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2017, Regionalisation of World Politics