PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Regionalisation of World Politics
How has ‘BREXIT’ affected the regionalisation process initiated by European Union and what could be its likely impacts in the regionalisation process of world politics?
How the answer moves
The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.
Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes
R1 EU as deepest integration → Haas’s spillover expectation → Britain’s 2016 vote moves the other way → cost without refutation; terms of regionalism change / R2 Brexit as the first live test of pooled sovereignty → scale and confidence lost inside Europe → example carried outward
Body flow
loss of a major economy and political player → collective strength weakened → Moravesik: exit precedent → Euroscepticism (National Rally, AfD) → Hix: new trade barriers + regulatory divergence complicate integration → turn outward: example matters more than the loss → Thompson: “regionalism is out, sovereignty back in”; regionalism as ideological contest, not rational choice → with US pressure on NAFTA → protectionism encouraged → weaker projects exposed (SAARC, RCEP) → Acharya: separatist / nationalist movements emboldened → ASEAN, MERCOSUR strained → out of the EU but not NATO → economic regionalism separable from security
Counter-view
limits of supranationalism real, but retreat narrower than predicted → no domino; pro- EU turn in France → EU firmness makes exit costly → sovereignty pooled, never surrendered; members always free to leave → exit illustrates the design as much as it damages it
Conclusion routes
i R1 Brexit as a demand for reform → EU deepened after losing a major power / R2 regionalism continues, on more contested terms → sovereignty balanced against collective benefit
Model answer
Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.
