How the answer moves
The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.
Route 1 core claim: power always with an organised minority → so democracy = contest among elites, not rule of the people
Route 2 contrast: classical democracy promises government of the people → elite theory denies it → rule belongs to organised minorities
elite/mass division grounded in classical theory → Mosca (class that rules vs class that is ruled; minority always at the helm) → Pareto (circulation of elites; rule stays with the few) → Michels (Iron Law; “organisation = oligarchy”; even democratic parties oligarchise) → Schumpeter (democratic elitism; democracy = competitive method for votes; people only choose/replace rulers) → Lasswell (who governs; politics = who gets what; elites capture values — income, respect, safety)
denies democracy as rule of the people / citizens reduced to voters between elites → pluralist reply: many power centres fragment elites and keep them responsive
Route 1 elite theory remains a strong reminder: organised minorities shape every political order
Route 2 elite theory makes democracy procedural — selecting and replacing rulers, not self-government
Model answer
Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.
Also asked on this head
Democracy — 11 questions in the Vault.
- The foundational base of western democracy has been
- Deliberative democracy seeks to promote democratic decision making about public issues among the citizens. Discuss
- Success of contemporary democracies lies in the State limiting its own power. Explain.
How this is taught
The same flow snapshot, built for every head of the syllabus, with the answer written in class.
The first session of Foundation 2027 is published in full.
Six programmes across three levels.