PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Recent Developments in Foreign Policy — Part 1

“The war in Afghanistan is crucial from the point of view of India’s national security. If the Americans withdraw and jihadis emerge with a sense of triumphalism, India will face increasing onslaught of terrorism”. Comment

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 fear is well-founded → Afghanistan on NW approaches + 1990s Kabul as terror nursery → but must the prediction follow?

Route 2 Afghanistan = India’s security buffer → US exit + triumphant Taliban did happen → so test the determinism, not the concern

Body flow

why Afghanistan matters (buffer, radical ideology, drugs, ISI proxies / Chadha: stable Afghanistan curbs terror) → trigger arrived (Aug 2021 pullout; Narayanan: US left it worse; stronger, self-financing Taliban 2.0) → the straight line bends: Taliban–ISI–jihadi front fractures → Kabul–Islamabad open war over TTP & Durand Line (“Indian proxy” jibe) → threat changes actor: ISKP (Routray), anti-Taliban + anti-India, Voice of Khurasan incites Indian youth → India’s reply: no recognition, no retreat → aid + UNSC 2593 + Muttaqi’s Oct 2025 Delhi visit post-Pahalgam

Counter-view

danger is still real: ISI proxies (LeT/JeM) persist, Taliban 2.0 stronger, ISKP active → Happymon Jacob: soft power alone, no Plan B → Taliban–Pakistan friction offers only limited relief

Conclusion routes

Route 1 security stake genuine; threat real but reshaped in source & form → India now shapes the outcome, not merely suffers it

Route 2 concern valid, prediction not deterministic → risk managed by calibrated engagement — neither recognition nor retreat

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2020, Recent Developments in Foreign Policy — Part 1