Bring out the major differences between the Classical Realism of Hans Morgenthau and the Neorealism of Kenneth Waltz.
How the answer moves
The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.
Route 1 common realist ground (power, anarchy, self-help) → one root difference: the source of the power-struggle
Route 2 both realist → disagree on where power politics begins → that root drives every other difference
Morgenthau: cause in human nature (Politics Among Nations, objective laws from that nature) → Waltz: cause in system structure (Theory of International Politics, anarchy + distribution of capabilities; leaders/human nature downplayed, structure compels) → purpose of power: end (classical) vs means to survival (neorealism) → method: subjective/philosophical vs systematic/scientific, modelled on microeconomics → ethics: prudence present in Morgenthau vs largely absent in Waltz
despite the differences, both stay within realism → shared self-help + balance of power → a reworking of the foundation, not a break
Route 1 evolution from a human-centric to a system-centric account of IR
Route 2 structural rigour gained, but Morgenthau’s attention to statecraft and ethics set aside
Model answer
Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.
Also asked on this head
Approaches to the Study of International Relations — 10 questions in the Vault.
- Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism’s dark view of international politics. Comment.
- Explain the various facets of the idealist approach to the study of international relations. Comment on its contemporary relevance.
- Explain the central tenets of the World-Systems Theory.
How this is taught
The same flow snapshot, built for every head of the syllabus, with the answer written in class.
The first session of Foundation 2027 is published in full.
Six programmes across three levels.