PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Approaches to International Relations

What are the core assumptions of idealism as an approach to study international relations? Explain its continuing relevance in peace building.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 interwar liberal thought = idealism Enlightenment faith: humans rational, world reformable war removable, peace reachable

Route 2 idealist optimism vs realist pessimism good nature + shared interests these very premises still drive peace-building

Body flow

human nature good war from bad institutions, not fixed drive reform removes it individuals primary, states pluralistic (group bargaining) interests dynamic (self- + other-regarding) mutual interests cooperation without a hegemon Hoffmann: self-restraint / moderation / compromise / peace three pillars (institutions, interdependence, democracy) Couloumbis & Wolfe: “art of good government” pillars carried into practice Kant (republican constitutionalism + federation) Wilson (collective security) Doyle (democratic peace) contemporary survival: UN, Paris Agreement, SDGs

Counter-view

realists brand idealism utopian its harmony-of-interests optimism doubted

Conclusion routes

Route 1 assumptions are no utopian relic enduring rule-based cooperation vindicates the institutional wager

Route 2 idealism survives as the working logic of institution-based peace — sharpened by realism, not defeated by it

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2020, Approaches to International Relations