PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Contemporary Global Concerns — I

Is democracy promotion in developing countries a feasible idea?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 can democracy be exported? the record is mixed feasibility turns on method, not goal feasible as facilitation from within, not coercion

Route 2 democracy’s universal appeal (Locke: safeguard of rights) method decides feasibility feasible only where change is organic

Body flow

case for promotion: Doyle’s democratic peace (democracies more peaceful, esp. with each other; political culture + moral values + economic ties) Sen vs Lee Kuan Yew: democracy democratises development but imposition counter-productive: Locke’s blind spot (authoritarian/tribal legacies) “democracy at gunpoint” Iraq/Afghanistan violence, weak governance, corruption, Taliban 2021 “cultural imperialism” (Appadurai) “illiberal democracy” (Zakaria): elections without institutions, unstable/hollow Huntington’s Third Wave: support works only where conditions are conducive Tunisia (2011 Arab Spring, civil society, internal commitment)

Counter-view

coercive external imposition (“democracy at gunpoint”) vs organic, internally-driven democratisation

Conclusion routes

Route 1 democracy thrives when internal movements are supported + institutions built over time

Route 2 feasible as facilitation of an organic, intrinsic process, not coercion

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2019, Contemporary Global Concerns — I