State subvention/funding may be an effective instrument in strengthening electoral democracy in India.
How the answer moves
The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.
Route 1 money power central to Indian elections → EC unable to fully check spending → state funding proposed as remedy
Route 2 fair elections need clean finance → state subvention as the instrument → effective only if partial + conditional
what it corrects → cuts corporate dependence + black money → levels field for smaller parties + clean candidates → Indrajit Gupta Committee (1998) endorsed in principle → Law Commission + Second ARC carry finance reform forward
not automatic → may fund non-serious / fake parties → hard to monitor → private spending persists → exchequer burden
Route 1 effective only as partial, conditional, audited funding → works within a reform package, not alone
Route 2 strengthens democracy when tied to transparency, spending caps, internal party democracy + firm EC oversight
Model answer
Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.
Also asked on this head
Party System — 18 questions in the Vault.
- Elucidate the prominent trends in voting behaviour in contemporary India, and discuss how astroturfing affects the scenario.
- When there are multiple stakeholders of power, conversation and consensus become the natural ingredients of governance. Analyze with respect to coalition politics.
- Critically assess the role of pressure groups in the decision-making process of the government.
How this is taught
The same flow snapshot, built for every head of the syllabus, with the answer written in class.
The first session of Foundation 2027 is published in full.
Six programmes across three levels.
