PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Party System & Electoral Politics

The changing socio-economic profile of our legislators does not augur well for the health of Indian democracy. Comment.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Burke’s microcosm = the yardstick judge the change against it verdict: social gain, economic-criminal danger

Route 2 “does not augur well” only half-true social widening deepens democracy; money + crime weaken its quality

Body flow

widening recruitment pool OBC / backward-caste entry ends upper-caste + lawyer + foreign-educated dominance Yadav: plebeianization / democratic upsurge House nearer Burke’s microcosm but presence ≠ responsiveness for lower orders upper castes still over-represented, women ~14%, Muslims below share turn to economic-criminal profile crorepati dominance (93% above ₹1 cr) wealth filters entry ADR: ~46% of 18th LS face criminal cases Vaishnav (When Crime Pays): costly elections + local problem-solvers SC: termite to democracy

Counter-view

against the pessimism social broadening is a genuine democratic gain (microcosm met, Yadav’s upsurge) threat lies not in who enters but in money + crime

Conclusion routes

Route 1 statement half-true social broadening augurs well; money-and-crime capture does not

Route 2 keep the widening, curb the muscle + money that distort it representation must become responsiveness

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2019, Party System & Electoral Politics