PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Party System & Electoral Politics

To what extent has the inadequate intra-party democracy affected the functioning of Indian democracy?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 parties = core of representation & governance intra-party democracy = transparency / participation / accountability its absence turns the damage inward

Route 2 in India the deficit is real and deep but “to what extent” serious, yet not without limits (stake the degree)

Body flow

structural problem set (high-command, dynasty, centralized nominations, weak internal elections) Michels “iron law of oligarchy” opaque candidate selection + money / muscle / defections personalization (Indira Congress, intermediate institutions weakened) factional splits why it matters: Sartori “schools of democracy” + Scarrow legitimacy internal failure erodes democratic legitimacy weak regulation (Section 29A, RPA) reform calls (Law Commission 170th Report, internal elections, transparent finance)

Counter-view

internal democracy is not costless Duverger (weakens cohesion) + Aldrich (capture by charismatic leaders / interest groups) the deficit alone cannot carry all the blame

Conclusion routes

Route 1 deep but not total weakens representation / candidate selection / accountability from within, not the sole determinant of performance

Route 2 reform path internal elections + transparent finance + enforceable regulation repairs much of it

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2020, Party System & Electoral Politics