PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Planning & Economic Development

What do you understand by Green Revolution? Do you think that a Second Green Revolution is needed to adequately address the agrarian challenges in contemporary India? Examine.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 GR = HYV-seed + input + assured-price package (mid-1960s), Swaminathan/Borlaug ‘begging bowl’ to ‘grain bowl’, self-sufficiency but gains narrow, model now exhausted

Route 2 GR ended food scarcity and famine fear yet its costs bred today’s distress so the question is what kind of second revolution, not whether to repeat

Body flow

gains carried costs Frankel: economic gains + political costs regional imbalance (Punjab/Haryana/W-UP vs eastern + rainfed) Shiva: ecological price (groundwater / soil / monoculture) chemical-heavy path today’s crisis (suicides, debt, low profitability) SGR needed, not a repeat Swaminathan’s “Evergreen Revolution”: productivity without ecological harm eastern + dryland focus, watershed, micro-irrigation, diversification, climate-resilient / organic

Counter-view

technology alone cannot settle a political-economic crisis Dreze & Sen: rising availability ≠ fair distribution

Conclusion routes

Route 1 yes, needed — but only as an Evergreen Revolution tied to procurement/MSP reform, public investment and secure land tenure seeds alone insufficient

Route 2 a second revolution for eastern/rainfed India and sustainability, yet the crisis is political-economic success rests on institutional reform, not technology alone

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2017, Planning & Economic Development