PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Representation & Participation

Explain the impact of electoral systems and cleavages in shaping party systems with reference to developing countries.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 party system = relevant parties (Sartori), not raw count → two shapers: electoral rules + cleavages

Route 2 electoral design vs social division → their interaction, not either alone → developing ≠ West

Body flow

district magnitude decisive → FPTP single-member vs PR multi-member → Duverger’s law (FPTP → two-party + candidate-centred; PR → multiparty + programme-based) → India deviation (no clean two-party; dominant-party ↔ coalition) → rule alone insufficient → cleavage = historical social line → caste/religion/language/ethnicity deeper than class → ethno-nationalist/religious/regional parties → Kothari (caste as mobilisation + electoral integration) → Bienen & Herbst (class weak in Africa) → religion fills gap (Algeria’s ISF) → FPTP + cleavages + Riggs’s prismatic society/formalism → intermediate party (closer to mass than elitist; India)

Counter-view

universal typologies exist (Weiner & La Palombara) vs same design + deep cleavages give context-specific systems that cannot be imported

Conclusion routes

Route 1 electoral design × cleavages, filtered through transitional society → distinctive developing-country systems

Route 2 interaction, not electoral rule alone → sets developing world apart from the West

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2021, Representation & Participation