Critically examine the role of political parties in sustaining and stabilising democracies in the developing societies.
How the answer moves
The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.
Route 1 parties = bridge between State & citizenry → participation, representation, accountability
Route 2 survival of democracy turns on party institutionalisation, not mere presence
Huntington: parties institutionalise mass participation = order → mobilisation outrunning institutions = disorder, party-less = coup-prone → Dahl (polyarchy): plurality bridges social/economic/ethnic groups, cuts marginalisation → Diamond: party competition = accountability = long-term stability
developing-world reality blunts these functions → Sandbrook: personalism over ideology + Webb: parties as personal/dynastic property → erodes accountability → Migdal (“strong societies, weak states”): clientelism/patronage stalls consolidation → Horowitz (“ethnic outbidding”): parties deepen polarisation instead of bridging cleavages
Route 1 role genuine but conditional → not parties as such but institutionalised parties sustain democracy
Route 2 India holds democracy through party churn → institutionalisation the deciding factor; without it, parties destabilise
Model answer
Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.
Also asked on this head
Politics of Representation and Participation — 12 questions in the Vault.
- Of late, centrist and centre-left political parties have been facing setbacks while centre-right parties have been in ascendency the world over. Comment.
- Discuss the major recent social movements related to the physical rights of women in various countries of the world.
- Discuss the role of social movements in strengthening the democratic processes in developing societies.
How this is taught
The same flow snapshot, built for every head of the syllabus, with the answer written in class.
The first session of Foundation 2027 is published in full.
Six programmes across three levels.