PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Indian Foreign Policy: Determinants & Institutions

Critically analyze the different phases of India’s foreign policy since independence. How justified, do you think, is S. Jaishankar’s classification of the current phase as the phase of ‘energetic diplomacy’?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 evolution, not rupture permanent factors (geography/history/culture) continuity vs dynamic factors change strategic autonomy the constant yardstick

Route 2 six named phases = adaptation to circumstance present phase the one to test judge it against the constant thread

Body flow

optimistic non-alignment (1946–62, NAM) realism & discovery (1962–70, 1962 war Indo-Soviet Treaty) regional assertion (1971–91, Bangladesh, Pokhran) strategic autonomy (1991–99, unipolar US/Israel/ASEAN) balancing power (2000–2013, India–US nuclear deal, Russia/China) each answers its moment, core intact energetic diplomacy (2014–present): leading-power aim India Way (‘transactional bazaar’/‘frenemies’, interests over idealism) engage America/manage China/reassure Russia markers: Global South, Indo-Pacific, BRICS–G20–SCO, Viksit Bharat 2047

Counter-view

label captures activism + risk-taking vs strong continuity of core aims (autonomy/security/development) hard to categorise, India early in transition government ahead of Track-II (media/think-tanks/academia)

Conclusion routes

Route 1 ‘energetic diplomacy’ justified as tempo & ambition, not a settled doctrine

Route 2 phases show adaptability & pragmatism; strategic autonomy the value that survives every shift

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2025, Indian Foreign Policy: Determinants & Institutions