PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Caste, Religion & Ethnicity

Critically examine the ethnic conflicts in North-East India.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 NE = one of India’s most ethnically diverse regions → a long cycle of autonomy, insurgency and inter-ethnic violence

Route 2 Varshney defines ethnic conflict → stake the question: born of diversity, or of state-building?

Body flow

forms of conflict → Nagaland (sovereignty demand / rejected Constitution / 1952 boycott / NSCN) → Assam (ULFA / anti-migrant / Bodoland) → Manipur (Meitei–Naga–Kuki) → Tripura (tribes vs Bengali migrants) → why? development school (Weiner: gaps, aspirations, unmet expectations) → instrumentalist turn (Muni: “creation of vested political interests”) → federation-building critique (Baruah: nation-state building ignored small communities; centralisation + AFSPA → alienation → “genuine federation-building”)

Counter-view

the state’s accommodation (Sixth Schedule, Art 371, statehood, Assam & Mizo Accords, development packages) vs the persistence of coercion

Conclusion routes

Route 1 Kohli: in a multicultural democracy assertion is expected → accommodation over force

Route 2 conflicts are less natural to diversity than made by state-building → resolution lies in genuine federation-building

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2013, Caste, Religion & Ethnicity