“Relative deprivation is a major source of ethnic conflict.” Elaborate the statement with relevant examples.
How the answer moves
The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.
Route 1 conflict not from difference but from perceived disadvantage → Gurr’s ‘ought–is’ gap
Route 2 relative deprivation defined → a group compares status / resources / recognition → identity becomes grievance
deprivation mechanism (economic, social, cultural, language exclusion) → North-East (Assam, Nagaland): neglect + weak development → Bodo: land, language, institutional exclusion → Telangana: deprivation within a larger state → Guru: Dalit exclusion (bottom-up) → Yadav: Jat / Patidar status-anxiety (dominant castes fear decline)
deprivation supplies the grievance but is not sufficient → it erupts as conflict only when politically mobilised
Route 1 deprivation = grievance, mobilisation = trigger
Route 2 the answer lies in recognition, representation and equitable development
Model answer
Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.
Also asked on this head
Caste, Religion and Ethnicity in Indian Politics — 10 questions in the Vault.
- Caste remains a vital axis for political mobilisation in India. How would the caste census address the aspirations of people? Discuss.
- Delineate the key factors that have shaped the evolving political landscape in Jammu and Kashmir post 2019.
- The rise of caste politics is to be attributed to both regional aspirations and electoral manifestations. Comment.
How this is taught
The same flow snapshot, built for every head of the syllabus, with the answer written in class.
The first session of Foundation 2027 is published in full.
Six programmes across three levels.