PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Caste, Religion & Ethnicity

Examine the role of religion in Indian electoral politics in the contemporary times.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 law bars religious appeals (RPA §123(3) + SC 2017) → yet religion stays a strong emotive factor in voting

Route 2 religion formally out of the ballot → in practice it works as “identity plus,” not alone

Body flow

mobilisation via symbols / sacred sites → Savarkar’s Hindutva (ethnic-territorial Hindu identity) → BJP’s rise since the 1980s tied to Hindu nationalist mobilisation → Hansen: set against democratic transformation, not purely religious → Advani’s “pseudo-secularism” → anti-Congress line → Ram Mandir / CAA / NRC / Babri / “Love Jihad” → vote polarisation + minority consolidation → Brass: institutionalised riots prepared & used electorally

Counter-view

religion no longer works alone → Yadav’s “Identity Plus” → faith combines with governance, employment, development → identity must pair with delivery

Conclusion routes

Route 1 religion is strong but not sufficient → parties must join identity with governance and delivery

Route 2 shift from religion-alone to “identity plus” → contemporary parties combine faith with development and security

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2020, Caste, Religion & Ethnicity