PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Local Government

Enunciate the impediments to women’s participation in local governance in the process of political decentralisation.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 73rd/74th reserved 1/3 seats + chairperson posts 10 lakh+ women entered presence achieved

Route 2 decentralisation widened entry, not participation impediments sit in the gap between presence and power

Body flow

proxy control most visible (“Pati Panchayat”, Sudha Pai; male relatives attend — Susheela Kaushik) rests on patriarchy (purdah, mobility curbs, male-leadership-as-natural; 2004 Haryana study) capability deficit (low education/training dependence on officials + male kin) double burden (household + family interference + no official cooperation — Bidyut Mohanty) institutional hostility inside councils (presence unacknowledged, not allowed to speak/seek info, no-confidence misused — James Manor) security + economic dependence + digital divide structural flaw: rotation of reserved seats blocks re-election (Rohini Pande)

Counter-view

impediments are not a case against reservation same decentralisation shifted local priorities (water/health/education) where women act freely barriers are removable, not inherent

Conclusion routes

Route 1 door opened by decentralisation; substantive participation needs the second step — capacity, safety, longer tenure, curbing proxy

Route 2 reservation gave the seat; converting seat into voice means breaking patriarchy + institutional resistance

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2025, Local Government