PYQ Vault · Paper 2 · Globalisation

How has the development of Global Capitalism changed the nature of socialist economies and developing societies?

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 global capitalism beyond borders (transnational capital / class / state) Soviet collapse removes the socialist alternative spreads via neo-liberal Washington Consensus

Route 2 end of Cold War = triumph of capitalism over socialism one market model now imposed on socialist + developing economies alike

Body flow

Neo-Gramscian hegemony of market fundamentalism (1980s–2008) IMF Structural Adjustment (reduced govt, liberalisation, privatisation) debt-hit socialist + developing states open markets socialist de jure, de facto mixed (East Europe) developing societies liberalise/privatise (India’s LPG) East Asian crisis 1997 dents IMF, but growth + falling poverty sustain commitment 2000s power shift 2007 IMF/World Bank voting favours developing countries India & China rise within the same system

Counter-view

Wallerstein: transnational division of labour keeps developing countries subordinate; states cannot regulate MNCs or sustain welfare 2008 crisis confirms Ngaire Woods: states vs markets, who really benefits

Conclusion routes

Route 1 West retreats to protectionism while developing countries defend free trade capitalism now a single world-system

Route 2 the nature changed decisively — no socialist or developing economy now stands outside global capitalism; only its terms remain contested

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2017, Globalisation