PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Organs of Government

Examine the constitutional provisions and nature of advisory jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India. Evaluate your answer with relevant examples.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Art 143 = source of advisory jurisdiction origin in Sec 213(1), GoI Act 1935 / Federal Court a consultative, non-binding power

Route 2 Executive seeks the Court’s opinion on a constitutional question before a dispute arises located in Art 143(1)–(2)

Body flow

143(1): question of law/fact, public importance, existing or likely Court may report opinion advisory, not binding 143(2): disputes barred from Art 131 broad: not limited to President’s functions, covers law or fact, even future questions meant for exceptional cases Court’s discretion under 143(1) to decline Delhi Laws Act Reference 1951 (first; delegated legislation) Kerala Education Bill 1957 (minority rights, education) Keshav Singh (advisory but great weight)

Counter-view

Value vs misuse sparing use removes doubt early + prevents unconstitutional action overuse becomes a political forum + burdens ordinary justice

Conclusion routes

Route 1 Legitimate when used sparingly settles constitutional doubt early, keeps government within the Constitution

Route 2 A consultative aid, not a political shortcut discretion + restraint preserve its value

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2025, Organs of Government