PYQ Vault · Paper 1 · Organs of Government

Judiciary has acquired the role of both, a legislature and an executive in recent years. Examine with suitable examples.

How the answer moves

The flow snapshot — the routes in, the body, the counter-view and the routes out.

Flow snapshot — how the answer moves
Intro routes

Route 1 Core judicial role = adjudication + constitutional review, not law-making/administration but Arts 32, 226, 136, 142 + PIL pull courts into both filling gaps or replacing elected branches?

Route 2 Claim partly real judiciary has stepped into legislative + executive space where does activism end and overreach begin?

Body flow

Legislature side: Vishaka guidelines = binding law till the 2013 Act Article 142 directions (khap panchayats, firecrackers) read like statutes Unnikrishnan / Mohini Jain expand Art 21 to education courts doing legislation’s work. Executive side: Prakash Singh enters police-reform domain M.C. Mehta pollution standards, forest governance, 2G continuing mandamus = sustained supervision, court acts like executive

Counter-view

Baxi defends activism as social justice (chemotherapy of carcinogenic politics) vs Pratap Bhanu Mehta (courts as political institutions, basic structure expands power) + Shunmugasundaram (judges ≠ legislators/administrators) democratic deficit: unelected, no policy accountability

Conclusion routes

Route 1 Claim partly true courts entered both domains, but mainly where elected branches defaulted

Route 2 Activism legitimate when it protects rights / fills gaps overreach when judges replace, not prompt, legislature/executive

Model answer

Handwritten, in the form it would be written in the examination hall.

Handwritten model answer — UPSC PSIR 2017, Organs of Government