Steps worth taking- Sound advice from Parliament on judicial reform

sfg-2026
ForumIAS LATEST
      1. SFG FRC 2027 | Program starts from 19th Dec. 2026 | Admissions open for Entrance Test Click Here to know more →
      2. Prelims Test Series (PTS) for Prelims 2027 starts 11th Oct. 2026 Click Here to know more →
      3. [Pre-order] Ethics Redbook 3rd Edition: Delivery starts from 10th October onwards Click Here to Read More →
      4. 21 Sept. | GS Advance Program (GSAP) for UPSC 2027 Mains starts from 11th Oct. Click Here to Read More →

Source: The post is based on the article “Steps worth taking- Sound advice from Parliament on judicial reform” published in Business standard on 10th August 2023.

Syllabus: GS2- Separation of powers between various organs

News: The author discusses a recent parliamentary report suggesting reforms in India’s judiciary. It emphasizes raising judges’ retirement age, reassessing post-retirement jobs, reducing court holidays, creating regional Supreme Court Benches, and improving diversity in the higher judiciary.

What are the reforms suggested by parliamentary report in India’s judiciary?

Suggested Reforms in India’s Judiciary:

  1. Retirement Age: Raise the retirement age for judges. This addresses concerns about judges seeking post-retirement jobs funded by the public.
  2. Post-retirement Jobs: Reassess post-retirement public appointments for judges. The current system gives the executive potential influence over judges’ futures.
  3. Court Holidays: Reduce the long holidays of superior judiciary benches. Current long breaks limit litigants’ access to the higher courts.
  4. Regional Supreme Court Benches: Establish Supreme Court Benches outside New Delhi. This addresses the high travel costs and language barriers for many Indians. For example, Travel to New Delhi is costly and arguing in non-local languages can be challenging for some Indians.
  5. Diversity in Judiciary: Address the declining representation of marginalized communities in the higher judiciary. The court needs diversity to maintain public legitimacy.

What are the significance of these recommendations?

Enhanced Judicial Impartiality: Raising the retirement age can reduce judges’ dependence on post-retirement jobs. Less chance of executive influence on a judge’s decisions.

Increased Public Trust: By reassessing post-retirement jobs, public faith in unbiased judgments grows.

Improved Court Efficiency: Reducing court holidays ensures faster case resolution. Litigants will have better access to the courts.

Greater Access to Justice: Regional Supreme Court benches eliminates travel barriers. Litigants can argue in local languages, reducing linguistic challenges.

Promotion of Practical Federalism: Regional benches help in decentralizing the judicial system. More areas get representation and better judicial access, reflecting federal principles.

Representation and Legitimacy: More diverse judges ensure marginalized communities are represented. A diverse court enhances its legitimacy and reduces executive control in the appointment process.

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community