Mediating, Minus Sarkar – on Mediation Bill

ForumIAS announcing GS Foundation Program for UPSC CSE 2025-26 from 26th June. Click Here for more information.

Source: The post is based on the article “Mediating, Minus Sarkar” published in Times of India on 10th August 2023.

Syllabus: GS2- Dispute redressal mechanisms

News: The author discusses the new Mediation Bill passed in India, which formalizes and promotes mediation as a mainstream method for resolving disputes.

What are the main features of the Mediation Bill?

Recognition of Mediation: The bill recognizes mediation as a key method for resolving various disputes, from commercial to personal matters.

Definition: Mediation involves a neutral third person helping parties find an amicable settlement.

Types: Includes conciliation, community, and online mediation.

Mediation Agreement: Given the same status as a court judgment, harder to challenge than an arbitral award.

Online Mediation: Specific rules are provided for Online Mediation.

Mediation Council: Established with experienced members from mediation, law, government, and industry sectors.

Training & Service Providers: The bill acknowledges mediation institutes and service providers.

Community Mediation: Addressing local peace and harmony issues.

What are the benefits of the Mediation Bill?

Speedy Process: Mediation can be done within days to a few months, much faster than litigation.

Cost-Efficient: While now a profession, mediation remains less costly than court proceedings.

Active Participation: Disputants play a central role, unlike in adversarial processes.

Amicable Solutions: Focuses on practical agreements benefiting both parties rather than strictly legal verdicts.

Enforceability: Mediation agreements are easily enforced.

High Success Rate: Often sees success rates above 50%.

Support from Lawyers: Many lawyers appreciate mediation for its advantages and benefits to clients.

What are the limitations of the Mediation Bill?

Exclusions in Schedule: The bill has a lengthy list of cases not suitable for mediation. For instance, many disputes involving the government are excluded, indicating a preference for the state to continue litigations with citizens.

Ambiguous Provisions: Compoundable criminal offences are listed as non-mediatable, but another awkwardly drafted provision makes them mediatable.

Weak Language: Mandatory mediation before litigation is emphasized in soft terms, which might dilute its impact.

Section 49 Issue: There’s a significant loophole in Section 49, making it less stringent.

Absence of Practising Mediators: The Mediation Council lacks representatives from the current practicing mediators, which seems like an oversight.

Non-adherence to Singapore Convention: The bill doesn’t incorporate the Singapore Convention, which would have made enforcement of international commercial mediated settlements more accessible globally.

Over-Reliance on Mediators: The success of the bill heavily depends on the continuous efforts of mediators across the country.

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community