About 10pm Quiz - In this initiative, we post 10 MCQs daily. Questions are based on Current affairs. We at ForumIAS believe that practicing quality questions on a daily basis can boost students’ prelims preparation.
For archives click HERE →
10 PM Quiz: June 6, 2020
Test-summary
0 of 10 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
Information
Click on ‘Start Test’ button to start the Quiz.
All the Best!
You have already completed the test before. Hence you can not start it again.
Test is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 10 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 scores, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Answered
- Review
- Question 1 of 10
1. Question
1 pointsWhich of the following is/are correctly matched?
- Bhopal Gas tragedy – Potassium Isocyanate
- Fukushima Daiichi – Nuclear radiation
- Visakhapatnam gas leak – Styrene
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Correct
Option 1 is incorrect. The Bhopal gas tragedy was a methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas leak incident in December 1984 at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.
Option 2 is correct. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster was a nuclear radiation accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Okuma, Japan in 2011.
Option 3 is correct. The Visakhapatnam gas leak was an industrial accident in May 2020 that occurred at the LG Polymers in which people were exposed to Styrene.
Incorrect
Option 1 is incorrect. The Bhopal gas tragedy was a methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas leak incident in December 1984 at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.
Option 2 is correct. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster was a nuclear radiation accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Okuma, Japan in 2011.
Option 3 is correct. The Visakhapatnam gas leak was an industrial accident in May 2020 that occurred at the LG Polymers in which people were exposed to Styrene.
- Question 2 of 10
2. Question
1 pointsWhich of the following is/are Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) recognized by the World Health Organisation?
- Ebola
- Dengue
- Rabies
- Leprosy
- Snakebite envenoming
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Correct
Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are a diverse group of diseases that prevail in tropical and subtropical conditions in 149 countries. WHO lists includes:
Buruli ulcer, Chagas disease, Dengue and Chikungunya, Dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease), Echinococcosis, Foodborne trematodiases, Human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness), Leishmaniasis, Leprosy (Hansen’s disease), Lymphatic filariasis, Mycetoma, chromoblastomycosis and other deep mycoses, Onchocerciasis (river blindness), Rabies, Scabies and other ectoparasites, Schistosomiasis, Soil-transmitted helminthiases, Snakebite envenoming, Taeniasis/Cysticercosis, Trachoma and Yaws (Endemic treponematoses).
Incorrect
Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are a diverse group of diseases that prevail in tropical and subtropical conditions in 149 countries. WHO lists includes:
Buruli ulcer, Chagas disease, Dengue and Chikungunya, Dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease), Echinococcosis, Foodborne trematodiases, Human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness), Leishmaniasis, Leprosy (Hansen’s disease), Lymphatic filariasis, Mycetoma, chromoblastomycosis and other deep mycoses, Onchocerciasis (river blindness), Rabies, Scabies and other ectoparasites, Schistosomiasis, Soil-transmitted helminthiases, Snakebite envenoming, Taeniasis/Cysticercosis, Trachoma and Yaws (Endemic treponematoses).
- Question 3 of 10
3. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding the Patents Act, 1970:
- Term of a patent granted under the act is twenty years from date of filing of the application.
- The act provides for conditional compulsory licensing of patented products.
- An invention mentioning new biological material that is not available in public is not patentable.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
Statement 1 is correct. Act provides term of patent in India as 20 years from the date of filing the patent application. In case of applications filed under the Patent Cooperative Treaty (PCT), the term of 20 years begins from the international filing date.
Statement 2 is correct. The act provides that at any time after the expiration of three years from the date of the grant of a patent, any person interested may make an application to the Controller of Patents for grant of compulsory license on patent on any of the following grounds, namely:
(a) that the reasonable requirements of the public with respect to the patented invention have not been satisfied, or
(b) that the patented invention is not available to the public at a reasonably affordable price, or
(c) that the patented invention is not worked in the territory of India.
Statement 3 is incorrect. The act provides that if the applicant mentions a biological material in the specification and if such material is not available to the public, the application shall be completed by depositing the material to an international depository authority under the Budapest Treaty.
Incorrect
Statement 1 is correct. Act provides term of patent in India as 20 years from the date of filing the patent application. In case of applications filed under the Patent Cooperative Treaty (PCT), the term of 20 years begins from the international filing date.
Statement 2 is correct. The act provides that at any time after the expiration of three years from the date of the grant of a patent, any person interested may make an application to the Controller of Patents for grant of compulsory license on patent on any of the following grounds, namely:
(a) that the reasonable requirements of the public with respect to the patented invention have not been satisfied, or
(b) that the patented invention is not available to the public at a reasonably affordable price, or
(c) that the patented invention is not worked in the territory of India.
Statement 3 is incorrect. The act provides that if the applicant mentions a biological material in the specification and if such material is not available to the public, the application shall be completed by depositing the material to an international depository authority under the Budapest Treaty.
- Question 4 of 10
4. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements:
- Follow on Public Offer refers to a private company issuing shares to public for the first time.
- Rights issue refers to issue of shares to existing shareholders.
- Preferential Offer refers to issue of shares to any select person or group of persons on a preferential basis.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
Statement 1 is incorrect. A private company issuing its shares for first time to go public is called Initial-public offer (IPO). FPO (Follow on Public Offer) is a process by which a company, which is already listed on an exchange, issues new shares.
Statement 2 is correct. A rights issue is an offer to existing shareholders of a company to purchase additional new shares in the company.
Statement 3 is correct. A preferential issue is an issue of shares or convertible securities by companies to a select group of investors; it does not include rights issue or public issues.
Incorrect
Statement 1 is incorrect. A private company issuing its shares for first time to go public is called Initial-public offer (IPO). FPO (Follow on Public Offer) is a process by which a company, which is already listed on an exchange, issues new shares.
Statement 2 is correct. A rights issue is an offer to existing shareholders of a company to purchase additional new shares in the company.
Statement 3 is correct. A preferential issue is an issue of shares or convertible securities by companies to a select group of investors; it does not include rights issue or public issues.
- Question 5 of 10
5. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding the Solicitor General of India:
- It is a constitutional post.
- A person appointed as Solicitor General in not eligible for reappointment.
- He/she cannot defend an accused person in a criminal prosecution, without the permission of the Government of India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
Statement 1 is incorrect. Solicitor General is not a constitutional post, unlike the Attorney General of India which finds mention in the constitution.
Statement 2 is incorrect. A person who has held the post of Law officer such as Solicitor General is eligible for reappointment.
Statement 3 is correct. There are certain restrictions on the Law Officers of the government like they cannot defend an accused person in a criminal prosecution, without the permission of the Government of India or accept appointment to any office in any company or corporation without the permission of the Government of India.
Incorrect
Statement 1 is incorrect. Solicitor General is not a constitutional post, unlike the Attorney General of India which finds mention in the constitution.
Statement 2 is incorrect. A person who has held the post of Law officer such as Solicitor General is eligible for reappointment.
Statement 3 is correct. There are certain restrictions on the Law Officers of the government like they cannot defend an accused person in a criminal prosecution, without the permission of the Government of India or accept appointment to any office in any company or corporation without the permission of the Government of India.
- Question 6 of 10
6. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding the draft Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Rules, 2020:
- No person other than a Qualified Remote Pilot under these rules shall operate a Nano class UAS in India.
- A citizen of India of age 18 years or more is eligible to be authorized by DGCA as UAS operator and owner.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
The Ministry of Civil Aviation has issued draft Unmanned Aircraft System Rules, 2020.
Statement 1 is incorrect. The rules state that “no person other than a Qualified Remote Pilot ‘under these rules shall operate a UAS in India except the Nano class of UA.”
Nano Unmanned Aircraft weigh less than or equal to 250 grams.
Statement 2 is correct. — To be authorized by the Director-General of Civil Aviation as Authorized UAS Importer, Authorized UAS Manufacturer, Authorized UAS Trader, Authorized UAS Owner or Authorized UAS Operator, an applicant shall be:
(i) An individual who is— (a) a citizen of India, and (b) 18 years of age or more; or
(ii) a company or a body corporate provided that— (a) it is registered and has its principal place of business within India, and(b) the Chairman and at least two-thirds of its directors are citizens of India.
(iii) a firm or an association of persons or body of individuals or a local authority or any legal entity, whether incorporated or not, Central and State Government or an agency thereof.
Incorrect
The Ministry of Civil Aviation has issued draft Unmanned Aircraft System Rules, 2020.
Statement 1 is incorrect. The rules state that “no person other than a Qualified Remote Pilot ‘under these rules shall operate a UAS in India except the Nano class of UA.”
Nano Unmanned Aircraft weigh less than or equal to 250 grams.
Statement 2 is correct. — To be authorized by the Director-General of Civil Aviation as Authorized UAS Importer, Authorized UAS Manufacturer, Authorized UAS Trader, Authorized UAS Owner or Authorized UAS Operator, an applicant shall be:
(i) An individual who is— (a) a citizen of India, and (b) 18 years of age or more; or
(ii) a company or a body corporate provided that— (a) it is registered and has its principal place of business within India, and(b) the Chairman and at least two-thirds of its directors are citizens of India.
(iii) a firm or an association of persons or body of individuals or a local authority or any legal entity, whether incorporated or not, Central and State Government or an agency thereof.
- Question 7 of 10
7. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding the Near-Earth Objects (NEO):
- Near-Earth objects (NEOs) refer to asteroids and comets close to the Earth’s orbit.
- A Potentially Hazardous Asteroid NEO is one that will necessarily enter the Earth’s atmosphere.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
Statement 1 is correct. Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) are comets and asteroids that have been nudged by the gravitational attraction of nearby planets into orbits that allow them to enter the Earth’s neighborhood.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Potentially hazardous objects are NEOS with an orbit that can make close approaches to the Earth and large enough to cause significant regional damage in the event of impact on earth. As per NASA, Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHA) are NEAs whose Minimum Orbit Intersection Distance (MOID) with the Earth is 0.05 au or less.
It is not necessary that asteroids classified as PHAs will impact the Earth; it only means there is a possibility for such a threat.
Incorrect
Statement 1 is correct. Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) are comets and asteroids that have been nudged by the gravitational attraction of nearby planets into orbits that allow them to enter the Earth’s neighborhood.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Potentially hazardous objects are NEOS with an orbit that can make close approaches to the Earth and large enough to cause significant regional damage in the event of impact on earth. As per NASA, Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHA) are NEAs whose Minimum Orbit Intersection Distance (MOID) with the Earth is 0.05 au or less.
It is not necessary that asteroids classified as PHAs will impact the Earth; it only means there is a possibility for such a threat.
- Question 8 of 10
8. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding the Global Vaccine Summit, 2020:
- India participated in this summit hosted by the United Kingdom.
- The summit raised funds for the World Health Organisation.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
Statement 1 is correct. The Vaccine Summit 2020 was hosted recently by London, United Kingdom. India also participated in the summit.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The summit was to raise the funds for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. World leaders have pledged an additional US$ 8.8 billion for Gavi. India also pledged $15 million as India’s contribution to the Gavi.
Incorrect
Statement 1 is correct. The Vaccine Summit 2020 was hosted recently by London, United Kingdom. India also participated in the summit.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The summit was to raise the funds for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. World leaders have pledged an additional US$ 8.8 billion for Gavi. India also pledged $15 million as India’s contribution to the Gavi.
- Question 9 of 10
9. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Ordinance 2020:
- It limits the regulation of supply of food stuffs to only under extraordinary circumstances like war, famine, steep price rise or calamity.
- Stock limits may be imposed in case of hundred percent price rise of horticulture produce and fifty percent price rise of non-perishable agricultural food stuffs.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
Both statements are correct.
The ordinance states that the supply of such food stuffs (including cereals, pulses, potato onions, edible oilseeds and oils) as the Central Government may by notification in the Official Gazette, specify, may be regulated only under extraordinary circumstances which may include war, famine, extraordinary price rise and natural calamity of grave nature.
Further any action on imposing stock limit shall be based on price rise and an order for regulating stock limit of any agricultural produce may be issued under this Act only if there is —
(i) Hundred percent increase in the retail price of horticulture produce; or
(ii) Fifty percent increase in the retail price of non-perishable agricultural foodstuffs,
over the price prevailing immediately preceding twelve months, or average retail price of last five years, whichever is lower.
Incorrect
Both statements are correct.
The ordinance states that the supply of such food stuffs (including cereals, pulses, potato onions, edible oilseeds and oils) as the Central Government may by notification in the Official Gazette, specify, may be regulated only under extraordinary circumstances which may include war, famine, extraordinary price rise and natural calamity of grave nature.
Further any action on imposing stock limit shall be based on price rise and an order for regulating stock limit of any agricultural produce may be issued under this Act only if there is —
(i) Hundred percent increase in the retail price of horticulture produce; or
(ii) Fifty percent increase in the retail price of non-perishable agricultural foodstuffs,
over the price prevailing immediately preceding twelve months, or average retail price of last five years, whichever is lower.
- Question 10 of 10
10. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding the Ordinance making power of the President:
- Constitution provides that an ordinance issued shall be void if it makes any provision which Parliament is not competent to enact under the Constitution.
- Ordinance issued by the President is not subject to Judicial Review.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
Statement 1 is correct. The article 123(3) of the constitution provides that if and so far as an Ordinance makes any provision which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.
Therefore the Ordinance issued by the President has same limitations and powers as the laws enacted by the Parliament.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The ordinance is subject to judicial review as any other act of the parliament.
In RC Cooper vs. Union of India (1970) the Supreme Court held that the President’s decision could be challenged on the grounds that ‘immediate action’ was not required; and the Ordinance had been passed primarily to by-pass debate and discussion in the legislature.
In AK Roy vs. Union of India (1982) Supreme Court argued that the President’s Ordinance making power is not beyond the scope of judicial review.
In DC Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar (1987) Court stated that the legislative power of the executive to promulgate Ordinances is to be used in exceptional circumstances and not as a substitute for the law-making power of the legislature.
Incorrect
Statement 1 is correct. The article 123(3) of the constitution provides that if and so far as an Ordinance makes any provision which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.
Therefore the Ordinance issued by the President has same limitations and powers as the laws enacted by the Parliament.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The ordinance is subject to judicial review as any other act of the parliament.
In RC Cooper vs. Union of India (1970) the Supreme Court held that the President’s decision could be challenged on the grounds that ‘immediate action’ was not required; and the Ordinance had been passed primarily to by-pass debate and discussion in the legislature.
In AK Roy vs. Union of India (1982) Supreme Court argued that the President’s Ordinance making power is not beyond the scope of judicial review.
In DC Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar (1987) Court stated that the legislative power of the executive to promulgate Ordinances is to be used in exceptional circumstances and not as a substitute for the law-making power of the legislature.
Discover more from Free UPSC IAS Preparation Syllabus and Materials For Aspirants
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.