[Answered] Analyze the role of the Lok Sabha Ethics Committee in maintaining the ethical conduct of MPs. Do you think the term ‘unethical conduct’ needs to be defined? Justify your answer.

The Ethics Committee of the Lok Sabha was set up in 2000, with a mandate to examine every complaint that is related to the unethical conduct of MPs & and recommend action thereafter. It is also tasked with formulating a code of conduct for MPs. The members of the Ethics Committee are appointed by the Speaker for one year.

Role of Ethics Committee in maintaining ethical conduct of MPs

• Investigation and Decision-Making: The committee is in charge of looking into complaints or claims that Members of Parliament have acted unethically. It looks into these complaints and makes inquiries to hold MPs responsible for their deeds.
• Advice and Guidance: The committee can also help Members of Parliament understand and abide by the code of conduct required of them as elected officials by offering them advice and guidance on ethical issues.
• Suggestions: In cases where unethical conduct is established, the committee can recommend appropriate action or sanctions against the erring MPs, including suspension or expulsion from the Lok Sabha.
• Education and Awareness: The committee can use a variety of techniques, such as seminars and workshops, to increase MPs’ understanding of moral principles and encourage moral behaviour.

Arguments in favour of defining ‘unethical conduct’

• Clarity and Consistency: MPs would have a better idea of what is expected of them if there was a comprehensive and explicit definition of unethical conduct. This may result in the ethical standards being upheld more consistently.
• Avoid Ambiguity: Clearly defining unethical behaviour helps avoid confusion and varying opinions about what ethical behaviour is. This can help to avoid arguments and guarantee that each Member of Parliament is held to the same standards.
• Transparency: A precise definition improves transparency in the evaluation of ethical conduct, making it simpler for the general public and MPs to determine whether a given action falls under the category of unethical behaviour.

Arguments against defining ‘unethical conduct’

• Flexibility: Ethical standards can evolve, and a rigid definition may limit the ability to adapt to changing norms and expectations.
• Subjectivity: What is considered unethical can vary based on cultural, societal, and individual perspectives. A detailed definition might still leave room for interpretation and disagreement.
• Complexity: Trying to list every possible unethical behaviour in a definition could lead to a cumbersome document.

Conclusion

The committee’s role in interpreting and applying ethical standards, while taking into account the evolving nature of ethics, is crucial to maintaining the integrity of parliamentary proceedings and the conduct of MPs.