Q. Consider the following statements:
1.The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (2002) discourage judges from making comments that could influence a case and require them to disqualify themselves if they cannot decide a matter impartially.
2.The Third Schedule in the Indian Constitution exempts judges from making oaths or affirmations as they are already appointed to uphold the Constitution and discharge their duties impartially.
Which of the statement(s) given above is/are correct?
Explanation –
Statement 1 is correct. The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct were adopted in 2002 as a set of ethical standards for judges, aiming to promote judicial integrity, impartiality, and independence. The principles emphasize that judges should avoid making statements or comments that could potentially influence the outcome of a case or prejudice the parties involved. Additionally, judges are expected to recuse themselves from cases where they cannot make an impartial decision due to potential conflicts of interest or personal biases.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Like other officials enumerated in the Third Schedule of the Indian Constitution, judges are constitutionally mandated to take an oath or affirmation. This oath includes a pledge to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law, to work without fear or favor, and to discharge duties impartially. The Third Schedule of the Indian Constitution lists the oaths or affirmations that various constitutional functionaries, including judges, must take before assuming their respective offices.
Source: The Hindu
